Apply De Novo Programming in Pavement Maintenance Strategy Optimization

Abstract:

With the highway network of Taiwan is intact gradually, the management of highway engineering is improving technology level to management level. Reducing the influence with pavement deteriorating, improving the pavement age and achieving the need of pavement service quality, it is a pavement agencys object. Present maintenance work depend on subjective experience judgment of civil engineer, but the kind of method is lack systemic planning. In view of this, Pavement Management system use multi-objectives goal programming to solving priority with the pavement maintenance works. But the multi-objectives programming method is considering multiple-objective, so it cans satisfied the ideal point. The De Novo Method is a new method to approach the ideal point. We try to using this method to solving Taiwan Freeways maintenance work programming.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 723)
• Pages: 805-811
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.723.805
• Online since: August 2013
• Authors: Ching Tsung Hung, Jyh Dong Lin, Pei Liu
• Keywords: De Novo Programming, Fuzzy Multiple-Objectives Programming, Pavement Maintenance

References

[1] Shahin, M.Y. and S.D. Kohn, Pavement Maintenance Management for Roads and Parking Lots, 1981, DTIC Document.

[2] Butt, A.A., et al., Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process. 1987.

[3] MacDonald, D., et al., Transportation Performance Measures in Australia, Canada, Japan, and New Zealand, 2004.

[4] Dekker, R., Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1996. 51(3): pp.229-240.

DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(95)00076-3

[5] Li, R.-J. and E.S. Lee, Fuzzy approaches to multicriteria De Novo programs. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1990. 153(1): pp.97-111.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-247x(90)90268-k

[6] Zeleny, M., Multiple criteria decision making. Vol. 25. 1982: McGraw-Hill New York.

[7] Zeleny, M., Optimal system design with multiple criteria: De Novo programming approach. Engineering costs and production economics, 1986. 10(1): pp.89-94.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-188x(86)90002-9

[8] Zeleny, M., In search of cognitive equilibrium: beauty, quality and harmony. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 1994. 3(1): pp.3-13.

DOI: 10.1002/mcda.4020030103

[9] Zeleny, M., New Frontiers of Decision Making for the Information Technology Era. 2000: World Scientific Publishing Company Incorporated.

[10] Bare, B.B. and G.A. Mendoza, Designing forest plans with conflicting objectives using<i> de Novo</i> programming. Journal of environmental management, 1990. 31(3): pp.237-246.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4797(05)80037-4

[11] Yu, P.-L., Y.-R. Lee, and A. Stam, Multiple-criteria decision making: concepts, techniques, and extensions. 1985: Plenum Press New York.

[12] Yu, P. and L. Seiford, Multistage decision problems with multiple criteria. Multiple Criteria Analysis: Operational Methods, 1981: pp.235-244.

[13] Zeleny, M., Linear multiobjective programming. 1974: Springer-Verlag Nueva York.

[14] Zeleny, M., Optimizing given systems vs. designing optimal systems: The De Novo programming approach. International journal of general systems, 1990. 17(4): pp.295-307.

DOI: 10.1080/03081079008935113