Analyses of Asphalt Pavement Distresses Using Formal Concept Analysis (FCA)

Article Preview

Abstract:

The literature has identified several possible causes of asphalt pavement distresses. Loadrelated distresses are apparent where the pavement has been overstressed by traffic loads applied to its surface. Climate/durabilityrelated distresses arise due to exposure to the environment. Otherrelated distresses are caused by actions not related to load or climate such as fuel spills or construction deficiencies. In this paper, information about fourteen asphalt pavement distresses frequently occurred on Taiwans pavements was surveyed, structured and explored using formal concept analysis (FCA) method. FCA is an important mathematical tool for conceptual data analysis and knowledge acquisition. By using FCA, the concept lattice of the formal context of asphalt pavement distresses was created and studied. Based on the concept lattice and association rules derived from FCA, the causes of asphalt pavement distresses were understood. The findings are consistent with the literature and actual conditions. This study provides alternative solutions to understand the causes of asphalt pavement distresses. This study also clearly shows that FCA is a useful method for further exploring and extending information on pavement distresses.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

790-797

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.Y. Shahin: Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots, Second Edition, Springer, New York (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] ASTM D 6433: Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys (1999).

DOI: 10.1520/d6433-09

Google Scholar

[3] R. Wille: Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts, In: Rival, I. ed. Ordered sets, Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston, pp.445-470 (1982).

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7798-3_15

Google Scholar

[4] R. Bruggemann, K. Voigt and C.E.W. steinberg: Application of formal concept analysis to evaluate environmental databases, Pergamon, Vol. 35, No. 3 (1997), pp.479-486.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(97)00133-1

Google Scholar

[5] J.Y. Shyng, H.M. Shieh and G.H. Tzeng: An integration method combining rough set theory with formal concept analysis for personal investment portfolios, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 23 (2010), pp.586-597.

DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2010.04.003

Google Scholar

[6] R. Wille: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 23, No. 6-9 (1992), pp.493-515.

DOI: 10.1016/0898-1221(92)90120-7

Google Scholar

[7] D. Eschenfelder, W. Kollewe, M. Skorsky and R. Wille: Ein Erkundungssystem zum Baurecht: Methoden der Entwicklung eines TOSCANA-Systems, In: Stumme, G., Wille, R., eds. Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung, Methoden und Anwendungen, Berlin: Springer, pp.254-272 (2000).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57217-3_12

Google Scholar

[8] U. Priss: Lattice-based information retrieval, Knowledge Organization, Vol. 27, No. 3 (2000), pp.132-142.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Eisenbarth, R. Koschke and D. Simon: Feature-driven program understanding using concept analysis of execution trace, In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Program Comprehension, International Conference on Software Maintenance (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/wpc.2001.921740

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Kalfoglou, S. Dasmahapatra and Y. Chen-Burger: FCA in knowledge technologies: Experiences and opportunities, In: Eklund, P., ed. LNCS 2961, In: Concept Lattices: Second International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, Berlin: Springer, pp.252-260 (2004).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24651-0_23

Google Scholar

[11] B. Ganter and R. Wille: Formal concept analysis - Mathematical foundations, Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1999).

Google Scholar

[12] U. Priss: Formal concept analysis in information science, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 1 (2006), pp.521-543.

DOI: 10.1002/aris.1440400120

Google Scholar

[13] Formica: Concept similarity in formal concept analysis: An information content approach, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 21, No. 1 (2008), pp.80-87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2007.02.001

Google Scholar

[14] M. Erné, J. Koslowski, A. Melton and G.E. Strecker: A primer on Galois connections, In: Proceedings of the 1991 Summer Conference on General Topology and Applications in Honor of Mary Ellen Rudin and Her Work, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 704, pp.103-125 (1993).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb52513.x

Google Scholar

[15] T. Tilley: Tool support for FCA, In: Eklund, P., ed. LNCS 2961, In: Concept Lattices: Second International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, Berlin: Springer, pp.104-111 (2004).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24651-0_11

Google Scholar

[16] J. Tane, T. Kaiser and S. Objedkov: The Concept Explorer, Available online: http://conexp.sourceforge.net/, Last accessed: January 8, 2013 (2013).

Google Scholar