Quantifying Overall Performance of Highway Design, Construction, and M&R Practices Using ECC & ASL

Article Preview

Abstract:

Developing a method that quantitatively evaluates and compares the overall performance from economic (agency) and user service perspectives of the highways constructed with different designs, different construction practices, in different places with different environments, and under different traffic conditions with different Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) histories, has been challenging. The factors (costs, effectiveness and traffic volume) are studied in this paper and then an economic and user service-based performance measure method is proposed to identify high or low pavement overall performance. The two indicators, Equivalent Comprehensive Cost (ECC) and an Average Service Level (ASL), in this method are proposed to evaluate the unit agency costs and average service level over the analysis period of the project quantitatively. Two different pavement projects were generated with hypothetical data to illustrate the ability of the proposed method to compare the overall performance of different projects, and a sensitivity analysis of the discount rate was also studied and discussed. Future research is recommended.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

753-760

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Muhammad Bilal Khurshid, M. I., Samuel Labi (2009). Comparison of Methods for Evaluating Pavement Interventions: Evaluation and Case Study. TRB 2009 Annual meeting

Google Scholar

[2] Lamptey, G., Ahmad, M., Labi, S., and Sinha, K.C. Life Cycle Cost Analysis for INDOT Pavement Design Procedures, Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/28, Purdue University, West Lafayette, 2004.

DOI: 10.5703/1288284313261

Google Scholar

[3] Labi, S. and K.C. Sinha. The Effectiveness of Maintenance and Its Impact on Capital Expenditures. Report FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002-27, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2003.

DOI: 10.5703/1288284313331

Google Scholar

[4] Samuel Labi1 and Kumares C. Sinha, Effectiveness of Highway Pavement Seal Coating Treatments. Journal of Transportation Engineering ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 1, 2004, pp.14-23.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2004)130:1(14)

Google Scholar

[5] Lytton, R. L. Concepts of Pavement Performance Prediction and Modeling. Proceedings of 2nd North American Conference on Managing Pavements, Public Roads, Vol. 2, Toronto.1987.

Google Scholar

[6] Labi, S., Lamptey, G., Konduri, S., and Sinha, K.C. An Analysis of Long-Term Effectiveness of Thin Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete Overlay Treatments. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1940, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp.3-12.

DOI: 10.1177/0361198105194000101

Google Scholar

[7] Muhammad B. Khurshid, Muhammad Irfan and Samuel Labi. Cost Effectiveness of Rigid Pavement Rehabilitation Treatments. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets (ICMPA), Calgary, Canada, 2008.Parker, D.

DOI: 10.1080/15732470902836566

Google Scholar

[8] Labi, S., Kong, S.H, Lamptey, G., and Nunoo, C. Long-Term Benefits of Microsurfacing in Indiana- Methodology and Case Studies. CD-ROM. 85th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006.

Google Scholar

[9] Geoffroy, D. W. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP, Synthesis of Highway Practice 223, Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996.

DOI: 10.17226/23377

Google Scholar

[10] Parker, D. (1993)Evaluation of Performance and Cost Effectiveness of Thin Pavement Surface Treatments, Oregon SP&R Study#5269, Oregon Department of transportation.

Google Scholar

[11] Fazil T. Najafi and Valerie Paredes B. Cost-Benefit Highway Pavement Maintenance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1749, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2001.

DOI: 10.3141/1749-04

Google Scholar

[12] Yuli Pan. Principle of the Pavement Management System. China Communications Press, 1996.

Google Scholar

[13] Office of Engineering Federal Highway Administration. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design. Pavement Division Interim Technical Bulletin September 1998.

Google Scholar

[14] Xuejun Deng. Road Subgrade and Pavement Engineering. China Communications Press, 1999.

Google Scholar

[15] Zukang Yao. Pavement Management System. China Communications Press, 1992.

Google Scholar

[16] Hao Li. The research on the discounting rate setting in the economic evaluation of investment projects. Master degree thesis of Central South University. 2003.

Google Scholar

[17] Jiangbi Hu, Yan Liu, Lingling Gao. Discount Rate Analysis about Bridge Life Cycle Cost . Highway, 2008(9).

Google Scholar