Payment for Enviromental Services Based on Three Environmental Evaluation Methods in Miyun Reservoir River Basin, Beijing, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

Payment for Environmental Services (PES) has been widely adopted as a solution to compensate upstream water users for providing clean water. However, the size of payments is critical to the success of PES, and the problems of determining the correct price is often critical to the implementation of PES policies. We demonstrate three independent valuation methods to determine the price of the ecosystem service (ES) of water quality in the Miyun Reservoir, the main surface water source for Beijing. The three using valuation methods are: i) Water Resources Benefits Assessment (WRBA), ii) Contingent valuation method (CVM), and opportunity cost of limitation of development rights (OCLDR). We found the value of water quality is lowest using OCLDR, highest with CVM, and the WRBA in-between. We propose OCLDR is used to determine compensation to upstream; WRBA for pricing water transfer; and CVM for payments integrated water quality improvement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

1155-1161

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Adamawicz W, Boxall P. American Journal Agriculture Economics, 1998, 80: 64-75

Google Scholar

[2] Bennett, J., 1996. Agenda 5, 2: 185-194.

Google Scholar

[3] Carson, Richard T., and Robert Cameron Mitchell, water resource research, 29, 2445-2454, (1993)

Google Scholar

[4] Hanemann W. M. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8,4, 19-43(1994)

Google Scholar

[5] Loomis J., Kent P. L. Ecological Economics, 33,103-117 , (2000).

Google Scholar

[6] Mitchell, R. and Carson, R., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Z. Q, Xu Z. M, Cheng G. D, et al. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22,6, 885-893, (2002), (in Chinese) .

Google Scholar

[8] Wang S. B. et al. Journal of Fudan University(Natural Science) 42,3, 463-467, (2003) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Zheng H.X, Zhang L. B. Environmental Protection1, 42-46. (2006) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Z. Zhang, Z. Xu, J. Wang. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 23(4): 360-366, (2001) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Freeman A. M. Measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods [J]. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1993.

Google Scholar

[12] Hanemann W. M. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1989, 71,4,1057- 1061.

Google Scholar

[13] Landell-Mills, N. Porras I T, Silver bullet or fools' gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impacts on the poor, International Institute for Environment and Development(IIED), (2001)

Google Scholar

[14] Navrud Stale. Pricing the European Environment. New York: Oxford University Press, (1992)

Google Scholar