A Comparative Study on the Analysis Methods for Chlorophyll-a

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper investigated three chlorophyll-a analysis methods in water sample. The UV-VIS spectrophotometry method followed SL88-2012 standard procedure, the results showed the detection limit of chlorophyll-a was 0.22 μg/L, with the lower detection limit of 1.0 μg/L. The detection range of the vivo chlorophyll-a fluorescence method was 0.1-300μg/L, the ratios of different algae matched that prepared in water samples. The detection limits and quantification limits for HPLC by using UVD and FLD were respectively 0.013 and 0.004 μg/L, 0.040 and 0.013μg/L. FLD was more sensitive than UVD for chlorophyll-a analysis, and the recovery of standard addition was in the range of 90.2% to 103.9% with UVD and FLD. Given the different pretreatment procedures of the sample, equipment conditions, correction and precision, vivo chlorophyll-a fluorescence method was the best on-site monitoring and the emergency monitoring method. Spectrophotometer was suitable for routine laboratory determination of chlorophyll-a, especially for bulk water samples. HPLC method had high precision and sensitivity, so this method applied to the determination of exact requirements, microanalysis and pigment separation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

1411-1415

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J W. LaBaugh, Relation of algal biovolume to chl-a in selected lakes and wetlands in north-central United States[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1995(52): 416~424.

DOI: 10.1139/f95-043

Google Scholar

[2] B. Freedman Environmental Ecology[B]. Sandiego Academic Press, 2002.

Google Scholar

[3] K.H. Wiltshire, S. Harsdorf, B. Smidt, G. Blocker, R. Reuter and F. Schroeder. The determination of algal biomass (as chlorophyll) in suspended matter from the Elbe estuary and the German Bight: A comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography, delayed-uorescence and prompt fluorescence methods[J]. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1998(222): 113-131

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0981(97)00141-x

Google Scholar

[4] Wang Ming-cui, Liu Xue-qing, Zhang Jian-hui. Evaluate method and classification standard on lake eutrophication[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 2002,18(5):47~49.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Eullaffroy and Guy Vernet. The F684/F735 chlorophyll fluorescence ratio: a potential tool for rapid detection and determination of herbicide phytotoxicity in algae[J]. Water Research, 2003(37): 1983~1990.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00621-8

Google Scholar

[6] M.F. Fernandez-Leon, M. Lozano, M.C. Ayuso, A.M. Fernandez-Leon and D. Gonzalez-Gomez. Fast and accurate alternative UV-chemometric method for the determination of chlorophyll A and B in broccoli (Brassica oleracea Italica) and cabbage (Brassica oleracea Sabauda) plants[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis.2010 (23): 809-813.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.03.024

Google Scholar

[7] L. Moberg, G. Robertsson and B. Karlberg. Spectrofluorimetric determination of chlorophylls and pheopigments using parallel factor analysis[J]. Talanta. 2001 (54): 161-170.

DOI: 10.1016/s0039-9140(00)00650-0

Google Scholar

[8] S.C. Huang, C.F. Hung, W.B. Wu, B.H. Chen. Determination of chlorophylls and their derivatives in Gynostemma pentaphyllum Malcino by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 2008 (48): 105-112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.05.009

Google Scholar

[9] Water quality-Determination of Chlorophyll by Spectrophotometry (SL88-2012)[S].

Google Scholar

[10] Feng Jing, Li Yanbo, Zhu Qing and Wu Weizhong. Comparision of methods for phytoplankton chlorophyll-a concentration measurement[J]. Ecology and Environment. 2008,17(2) :524-527.

Google Scholar

[11] Gao Qi, Zhao Shuguang, Tan Yumei, Ultrasonic extraction spectrophotometric determination of chlorophyll content in the plant leeks Science and Technology of Food Industry[J] 2007,28(8): 166~167.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Eullaffroy and G. Vernet. The F684/F735 chlorophyll fluorescence ratio: a potential tool for rapid detection and determination of herbicide phytotoxicity in algae[J]. Water Research. 2003 (37): 1983-1990.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00621-8

Google Scholar