Effects of Different Vegetation Types on Soil Microbiological Properties on the Loess Plateau

Article Preview

Abstract:

The re-establishment of natural species-rich health lands on abandoned farmland is one of the main measures in soil erosion control in the Loess Plateau of China. This study was conducted to understand how enzyme activities changed with nutritional properties and microbial biomass in different vegetation types in the loessial gully region of the Loess Plateau. Soil samples were collected in different vegetations which had planted for almost 30 years. For the collected soils, nutritional, microbial and enzymatic properties were determined. The result showed that soil nutritional properties and microbial biomass were enhanced in black locust-amorpha, compared with black locust, but weakened in Chinese pine-amorpha compared with Chinese pine. Besides, soil urease, α-amylase, alkaline phosphatase, catalase, saccharase and cellulase activities in creased with restoration, but decreased polyphenol oxidase. Moreover, urease activity was obviously high in korshinsk peashrub and black locust for the nitrogen fixation of them, and α-amylase was high in Chinese pine for low pH value. However, there still was a certain gap to Chinese arborvitae which was considered to be the climax community in the region. In general, the distance of vegetations to Chinese arborvitae was grassland > black locust > Chinese pine> korshinsk peashrub > Chinese pine-amorpha > black locust-amorpha.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

4893-4899

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X.M. Liu and H.L. Zhao, Comprehensive strategy for eco-environmental Control in Horqin sand land. Gansu Science and Technology Publishing–house, Lanzhou, China. (1993)

Google Scholar

[2] F.J. Hou, J.Y. Xiao and Z.B. Nan: Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. Vol. 13 (2002) pp.923-929

Google Scholar

[3] D.L. Mummey, P.D. Stahl and J.S. Buyer: Appl. Soil Ecol. Vol. 21 (2002) pp.251-259

Google Scholar

[4] C. Zhang, L. Huang, T. Luan, J. Jin and C. Lan: Geoderma Vol. 136 (2006) pp.555-565

Google Scholar

[5] J.M. Laflen and J.L. Tian, Soil erosion and dryland farming, CRC Press, Indiana, USA, 2000.

Google Scholar

[6] G.H. Wang: Acta Bot. Sin. Vol. 44 (2002) pp.990-998

Google Scholar

[7] C. Trasar-Cepeda, M.C. Leirós and F. Gil-Sotres: Soil. Biol. Biochem. Vol. 40 (2008) pp.2146-2155

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.03.015

Google Scholar

[8] G.P. Sparling, L.A. Schipper, W. Bettjeman and R. Hill: Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. Vol. 104 (2003) pp.523-534

Google Scholar

[9] R.P. Dick, D.D. Myrold and E.A. Kerle: Soil Science Society of America Journal Vol. 52 (1988) pp.512-516

Google Scholar

[10] R.P. Dick, P.E. Rasmussen and E.A. Kerle: Biology and Fertility of Soils, Vol. 6 (1988) pp.159-164

Google Scholar

[11] H.Y. Zou, G.B. Liu and H.S. Wang: Acta Bot Boreal-Occident. Sin. Vol. 22 (2002) pp.1-8

Google Scholar

[12] Editorial Committee, Soil physical and chemical analysis description of soil profiles, Standards Press of China, Beijing. (1996)

Google Scholar

[13] Soil Science Society of China, Soil physical and chemical analysis, Agricultural Science and Technology, Beijing. (1999)

Google Scholar

[14] ISSCAS (Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy Science), Physical and chemical analysis methods of soils. Shanghai Science Technology Press, Shanghai, China. (1978)

Google Scholar

[15] P.C. Brookes, A. Landman, G. Pruden and D.S. Jenkinson: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 17 (1985) pp.837-842

Google Scholar

[16] E.D. Vance, P.C. Brookes and D.C. Jenkinson: Soil Boil. Biochem. Vol. 19 (1987) pp.703-707

Google Scholar

[17] J. Wu, R.G. Joergensen, B. Pommerening, R. Chaussod and P.C. Brookes: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 22 (1990) pp.1167-1169

DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(90)90046-3

Google Scholar

[18] S.Y. Guan, Soil enzyme and its research approaches, China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 1986.

Google Scholar

[19] F.E. Clements, Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation, Carnegie institute of Washington publication. NO. 242, Washington DC. (1916)

Google Scholar

[20] J.B. Wilson and A.D.Q. Agnew: Adv. Ecol. Res. Vol. 23 (1992) pp.263-337

Google Scholar

[21] E.B. Adema and A.P. Grootjans: Plant Ecol. Vol. 167 (2003) pp.141-149

Google Scholar

[22] F.A. Rutigliano, R.D. Ascoli and A.V. De Santo: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 36 (2004) pp.1719-1729

Google Scholar

[23] M. McGill, K.R. Gannon, J.A. Robertson and F.D. Cook: Can. J. Soil Sci. Vol. 66 (1986) pp.1-19

Google Scholar

[24] C. Plaza, D. Hernández, J.C. García-Gil and A. Polo: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 36 (2004) p.1577–1585

Google Scholar

[25] D.S. Powlson, P.C. Brookes and B.T. Christensen: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 19 (1987) pp.159-164

Google Scholar

[26] Q.H. Zhou, Z.B. Wu, and S.P. Cheng: Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 37 (2005) pp.1454-1459

Google Scholar

[27] R.L. Sinsabaugh, M.E. Gallo, C. Lauber, M.P. Waldrop and D.R. Zak: Biogeochemistry Vol. 75 (2005) p.201–215

Google Scholar