Two Expression Vectors, Designated as pGEX-CDON and pC89S4-CDON, for Producing GST-CDON and pVIII-CDON Fusion Proteins

Article Preview

Abstract:

Deoxynivalenol (DON) mimotope, designated as CDON, is an epitope (CMRPWLQ) immunoscreened from a phage-displayed random peptide library. In order to replace the conjugated toxin with non-toxic recombinant proteins in ELISA, two novel expression vectors, which were designated as plasmid pGEX-CDON and phagemid pC89S4-CDON for producing GST-CDON and pVIII-CDON fusion proteins in E.coli were constructed. After purification, both GST-CDON and pVIII-CDON fusion proteins show good reactogenicity with an anti-DON antibody in a competitive inhibition ELISA test. When GST-CDON was used as coating antigen, the linear range of the competitive inhibition ELISA is from 62ng/ml to 410ng/ml, the linear equation is Y= 186.6-23.87Ln (X), IC50 is 194ng/ml. For pVIII-CDON as coating protein, the linear range of the competitive inhibition ELISA is from 20ng/ml to 470ng/ml, the linear equation is Y = 161.3-25.49Ln (X), R2=0.9962, IC50 is 94ng/ml. ELISA analysis and comparison show the reactogenicity and specificity of pVIII-CDON binding to anti-DON antibody are better than GST-CDON fusion protein. The pVIII-CDON is promising in establishing an ELISA without the use of the toxic mycotoxin conjugate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

505-510

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Foroud NA, Eudes F. Int J Mol Sci. Vol. 10(2009), p.147.

Google Scholar

[2] Starkey DE, Ward TJ, Aoki T, Gale LR, Kistler HC, Geiser DM, Suga H, To´th B, Varga J, O'Donnell K. Fung Genet Biol. Vol. 44(2007), p: 1191.

Google Scholar

[3] Bae HK, Pestka JJ. Toxicol Sci. Vol. 105(2008), pp.59-66.

Google Scholar

[4] Pestka JJ, Smolinski AT. J Toxicol Environ Health. Vol. 8(2005), pp.39-69.

Google Scholar

[5] Jestoi, M., Ritieni, A., Rizzo, A. J. Agric. Food. Chem. Vol. 52(2004), p.1464.

Google Scholar

[6] Klotzel, M., Gutsche, B., Lauber, U., Humpf, H.U. J. Agric. Food. Chem. Vol. 53(2005), p.8904.

Google Scholar

[7] Fang Ji, Hua Li, Jianhong Xu, Jianrong Shi. Toxins. Vol. 3(2011), p.968.

Google Scholar

[8] Pestka, J.J., Islam, Z. Amuzie, C.J. Toxicol. Lett. Vol. 178(2008), p.83.

Google Scholar

[9] Förster-Waldl E, Riemer AB, Dehof AK, Neumann D, Brämswig K, Boltz-Nitulescu G, et al. Mol Immunol. Vol. 42(2005), p.319.

Google Scholar

[10] Jyoti Pande, Magdalena M. Szewczyk, Ashok K. Grover. Biotechnology Advances. Vol. 28 (2010), p.849.

Google Scholar

[11] DENG Shunz hou, YU Zhou, YOU Shuz hu, et al. Chin J Public Health. Vol. 22(2006), p.1205 (in chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Smith DB, Johnson KS. Gene . Vol. 67(1988), p.31.

Google Scholar

[13] Smith, G.P. Science. Vol. 228(1985), p.1315.

Google Scholar

[14] Ying Wan, Yuzhang Wu, Jiang Bian, et al. Vaccine. Vol. 19(2001), p.2918.

Google Scholar

[15] Kristensen P, Winter G. Fold Des. Vol. 3(1998), p.321.

Google Scholar

[16] Litman GW, Rast JP, Shamblott MJ, Haire RN, Hulst M, et al. Mol Biol Evol. Vol. 10(1993), p.60.

Google Scholar