Effect of Porous-Jump Model Parameters on Membrane Flux Prediction

Hong Hai Li; Yang Yang Cheng

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.734-737.2210

Paper Titles

Preparing and Applying of Flame Retardant Microcapsules Containing Magnesium Hydroxide
p.2191

Research Progress on Surface Coating of Magnesium and its Alloys as Biomedical Materials
p.2195

Synthesis and Catalysis of Fe₃O₄ Nanoparticles for Degradation of Rhodamine B
p.2200

Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Ag-Doped BiVO₄
p.2204

Effect of Porous-Jump Model Parameters on Membrane Flux Prediction
p.2210

Inhibition of Corrosion and Scale Formation in Oilfield Produced Water Recycling System
p.2214

A Review on the Use of Chitosan and its Derivatives as Radical Scavenger and Metal Ions Chelating Agent
p.2218

Investigation into Acceleration Efficiency of Ultrasound in Dyeing Process
p.2222

Technique of Instantaneous Ultrasonic Extraction and Reverse Osmosis Concentration on Polyphenols of Chinese Herbs
p.2226

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 734-737Effect of Porous-Jump Model Parameters on Membrane...

Effect of Porous-Jump Model Parameters on Membrane Flux Prediction

Abstract:

A three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was performed to study the velocity distribution on membrane surface in membrane separation process, and the effect of face permeability, porous medium thickness, and pressure-jump coefficient of porous-jump model on membrane flux. The study shows that all the three factors have important impact on membrane flux. Membrane flux increases linearly with the increase of face permeability. When the membrane thickness is between 0.04~0.1mm, the membrane flux decreases with the increase of membrane thickness. The membrane flux decreases with the increase of pressure-jump coefficient. So that there must be a complex relationship between membrane flux and face permeability, porous medium thickness, and pressure-jump coefficient.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 734-737)

Pages:

2210-2213

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.734-737.2210

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Hong Hai Li, Yang Yang Cheng

Keywords:

Face Permeability, Membrane Separation, Porous-Jump Model, Pressure-Jump Coefficient

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] XS. Wang. Membrane separation technology and its application. M. Beijing: Chemical industry press. 2002. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Z. Wang,. Basic principles of membrane separation technology. M. Beijing: Chemical industry press. 2000. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Schwinge, DE. Wiley, D. Ffletcher. A CFD study of unsteady flow in narrow spacer-filled channels for spiral-wound membrane modules. J. Desalination. 146 (2002), p.195.

DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00470-8

Google Scholar

[4] YL. Li, KL. Tung. CFD simulation of fluid flow through spacer-filled membrane Module: selecting suitable cell types for periodic boundary conditions. J. Desalination, 233(2008), p.351.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2007.09.061

Google Scholar

[5] AL. Ahmad, KK. Lau, ZZ. Abu Bakar. Impact of different spacer filament geometries on concentration polarization control in narrow membrane channel. J. Journal of Membrane Science. 262(2005), p.138.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.056

Google Scholar

[6] M. Shakaib, S.M.F. Hasani, M. Mahmood. Study on the effects of spacer geometry in membrane feed channels using three-dimensional computational flow modeling. J. Journal of Membrane Science. 197(2007), p.74.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.010

Google Scholar

[7] H. Mirsaeedghazi, Z. Emam-Djomeh, SM. Mousavi et al. Modeling the membrane clarification of pomegranate juice with computational fluid dynamics. J. Eur Food Res Technol. 232(2011), p.671.

DOI: 10.1007/s00217-011-1434-8

Google Scholar