Italian Energy Portfolio Analysis: An Interactive Renewable Investments Tool

Article Preview

Abstract:

The portfolio analysis is a method for the strategic selection of energy sources able to drive the sustainable evolution of the renewable energy balance. In this paper the portfolio theory is applied in the Italian electricity market for different renewable energy sources (biomass, hydro, photovoltaic and wind) with the aim to select, by diversification, optimal portfolios that minimize investment risk. This analysis can be useful for energy planners to select future green scenarios based on the increasing use of renewable energy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

768-776

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Cucchiella F, D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M. Municipal waste management and energy recovery in an Italian region. Waste Management & Research. 2012; 30: 1290-8.

DOI: 10.1177/0734242x12462284

Google Scholar

[2] Koh SCL, Cucchiella F, Baldwin J, Shi G. Natural Resource Based Green Supply Chain Management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2012; 17: 54-67.

DOI: 10.1108/13598541211212203

Google Scholar

[3] Awerbuch S, Berger M. Applying portfolio theory to EU electricity planning and policy-making. In: Paper IEW, editor. EET/2003/03. Paris2003.

Google Scholar

[4] Marrero GA, Ramos-Real FJ. Electricity generation cost in isolated system: The complementarities of natural gas and renewables in the Canary Islands. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010; 14: 2808–18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.06.007

Google Scholar

[5] Munoz JI, Sanchez de la Nieta AA, Contreras J, Bernal-Agustın JL. Optimal investment portfolio in renewable energy: The Spanish case. Energy Policy. 2009; 37: 5273–84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.050

Google Scholar

[6] Kienzle F, Koeppel G, Stricker P, Andersson G. Efficient electricity production portfolios taking into account physical boundaries. 27th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, Houston2007.

Google Scholar

[7] Cucchiella F, D'Adamo I. Estimation of the energetic and environmental impacts of a roof-mounted building-integrated photovoltaic systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012; 16: 5245-59.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.034

Google Scholar

[8] Cucchiella F, D'Adamo I. Feasibility Study of Developing Photovoltaic Power Projects in Italy: An Integrated Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012; 12: 1562– 76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.020

Google Scholar

[9] Roques FA, Newbery DM, Nuttall WJ. Fuel mix diversification incentives in liberalized electricity markets: A Mean-Variance Portfolio theory approach. Energy Economics. 2008; 30: 1831–49.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.11.008

Google Scholar

[10] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance. 1952; 1: 77–91.

Google Scholar

[11] Cucchiella F, D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M. Modeling optimal investments with portfolio analysis in electricity markets. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A: Energy Science and Research. 2012; 30: 673-92.

Google Scholar

[12] Shi VG, Koh SCL, Baldwin J, Cucchiella F. Natural resource based green supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2012; 17: 54-67.

DOI: 10.1108/13598541211212203

Google Scholar

[13] Bhattacharya A, Kojima S. Power sector investment risk and renewable energy: A Japanese case study using portfolio risk optimization method. Energy Policy. 2012; 40: 69-80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.031

Google Scholar

[14] Westner G, Madlener R. The benefit of regional diversification of cogeneration investments in Europe: A mean-variance portfolio analysis. Energy Policy. 2010; 38: 7911-20.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.011

Google Scholar

[15] Bartelj L, Paravan D, Gubina AF, Golob R. Valuating risk from sales contract offer maturity in electricity market. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2010; 32: 147-55.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2009.06.022

Google Scholar

[16] Cucchiella F, D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M. Green Supply Chain and the Energy Recovery Plant in Abruzzo. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 25: 54-72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.528

Google Scholar

[17] Department of Energy and Climate Change. Review of the generation costs and deployment potential of renewable electricity technologies in the UK available at http: /www. decc. gov. uk/; (2011).

Google Scholar

[18] Cucchiella F, D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M. A multi-objective optimization strategy for energy plants in Italy. Science of the Total Environment. 2013; 443: 955-64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.008

Google Scholar

[19] Cucchiella F, D'Adamo I, Gastaldi M, Koh SCL. Renewable energy options for buildings: Performance evaluations of integrated photovoltaic systems. Energy and Buildings. 2012; 55: 208-17.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.029

Google Scholar

[20] Zhang S, Fu L. Exploring an integrated approach to utilize indigenous renewable energy to improve energy self-sufficiency and emission reduction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011; 15: 827-32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.016

Google Scholar

[21] Parker P. Residential solar photovoltaic market stimulation: Japanese and Australian lessons for Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2008; 12: 1944–58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.03.010

Google Scholar

[22] Awerbuch S, Yang S. Efficient electricity generating portfolios for Europe: maximising energy security and climate change mitigation. EIB Papers. 2007; 12.

Google Scholar

[23] Allan G, Eromenko I, McGregor P, Swales K. The regional electricity generation mix in Scotland: A portfolio selection approach incorporating marine technologies. Energy Policy. 2011; 39: 6-22.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.028

Google Scholar

[24] Calabrese A, Gastaldi M, Ghiron NL. Real option's model to evaluate infrastructure flexibility: an application to photovoltaic technology. International Journal of Technology Management. 2005; 29: 173-91.

DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2005.006014

Google Scholar