The Evaluation of Mould Made from Aluminium and Mild Steel for Polypropylene Integral Hinges Test Samples

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mould, which is made from mild steel and aluminium, and the effect of these moulds properties towards the quality of thermoplastics part. As for this research, two different types of mould material were fabricated by using Computer Numerical Controller (CNC) milling machine. These moulds were specifically design to produce a test sample which was an integral hinge made from Polypropylene. These moulds were tested practically by using Nissei-NP7-1F injection moulding unit. A set of parameter setting consisting of melt temperature, packaging pressure, injection time, packing time and mould temperature had been chosen to acquire the correlation between the mould materials and the part’s quality. Five tested samples were prepared for evaluation in terms of the material consumption, warpage, and shrinkage values. Results have been observed and analysed and it was found that in term of material consumption value, aluminium mould consumed 1.28 gram or 14% more polypropylene than mild steel. For warpage value, mild steel mould had the lowest value with only 0.08mm warpage. The third experiment showed that the lowest shrinkage was happened to be 0.01302, which was produced by mild steel mould. As the conclusion in this project, mild steel mould was selected as the desirable mould for producing integral hinges samples as compare with the aluminium mould.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 748)
• Pages: 235-240
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.748.235
• Online since: August 2013
• Authors: Mohd Hilmi Othman, Hasan Sulaiman, M.Z. Ibrahim, L. Li
• Keywords: Aluminum (Al), Injection Molding, Integral Hinges, Mild Steel, Mould, Polypropylene (PP)

References

[1] Boujelbene, M., Moisan, A., Younsi, N., & Brenier, B. (2004). Productivity Enhancement in Dies and Mould Manufacturing. Int, J. Mach. Tool manuf. Ms44.

[2] http: /www. moldmakingtechnology. com/articles/three-considerations-for-mold-steel-selection.

[3] Z. W Zhong, M. H. Leong & X. D. Liu. (2006). The wear rates and performance of three moulds insert materials.

[4] T. Nagaoka, U.S. Ishiaku, T. Tomari, H. Hamada, S. Takashima Effect of molding parameters on the properties of PP/PP sandwich injection moldings,   Polymer Testing, Volume 24, Pages 1062-1070, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.04.003

[5] W. C Bushko, V. K Strokes, (1995). Solidification of Thermociscoelastic Melt II, Effect of Processing Condition on Shrinkage and Residual Stresses, pg365.

[6] M.C. Song, Z. Liu, M.J. Wang, T.M. Yu, D.Y. Zhao Research on effects of injection process parameters on the moulding process for ultra-thin wall plastic parts, Original Research Article, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volumes 187-188, Pages 668-671, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.103

[7] Alfredo Campo, (2006). The Complete Part Design Handbook for Injection Moulding of Thermodynamics, Hanser Publisher, Munich, pg548.

[8] http: /www. buzzle. com/articles/aluminum-uses-of-aluminum. html.

[9] Clive Maier & Teresa Calafut, (1998). Polypropylene". The Definite User, s Guide and Data book. United State of America.

[10] R.A. Tatara, R.M. Sievers, Valentin Hierzer Modelling the injection moulding processing of a polypropylene closure having an integral hinge, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Volume 176, Issues 1-3, Pages 200-204, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.153

[11] Martinez-Mateo, F. J. Carrion-Vilches, J. Sanes, & M. D. Bermudez, (2001). Surface damage of mould steel and its influence on surface roughness of injection moulded plastic part.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.11.054