Comparation of Cu-Co-Mn Mixed Oxides and Hopcalite as Support in Synthesis of Diphenyl Carbonate by Oxidative Carbonylation of Phenol

Article Preview

Abstract:

The difference of Cu-Co-Mn mixed oxides and hopcalite as support in synthesis of diphenyl carbonate by oxidative carbonylation of phenol was studied. The catalysts were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray power diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The results show that the average particle diameter of the former catalyst is about 40 nm, whereas the other catalyst is about 0.5 μm. The main crystal phase in the former catalyst is Co2MnO4 and Pd0.5Pd3O4, which in the latter catalyst is CuMn2O4, CoMn2O4 and Pd0.5Pd3O4.The oxygen atoms lose electrons and form oxygen vacancies in.Pd0.5Pd3O4 and Co2MnO4 of the former catalyst, which destroys the crystal integrity and prompts the oxygen adsorption on the crystal surface. The oxygen atoms lose electrons and form oxygen vacancies in.Pd0.5Pd3O4 of the latter catalyst. Finally, it was found that the difference of the yield and selectivity of the both catalysts was not remarkable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 750-752)

Pages:

1287-1291

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hyunjoo Lee, Jin Yong Bae, and O-Sung Kwon. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 2004, 689, 1816–1820.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhiping Du, Zhikun Lin, and Liming Huang. Petrochemical technology, 2012, 41 (8): 894-900. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Fuming Mei, Guangxing Li. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2000, 28(6): 481-484. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] I. I. Moiseev, M. N. Michael, and V. Vargaftiana. J Mol Cat A: Chemical, 1996, 108(1): 77-85.

Google Scholar

[5] Hiroshi Iwane. JP: 06271506, (1994).

Google Scholar

[6] Juji Ookago. JP: 08193056, (1996).

Google Scholar

[7] Hans-Josef Buysch. EP: 736324, (1996).

Google Scholar

[8] Wasatoshi Takagi. JP: 09278716, (1997).

Google Scholar

[9] Wasatoshi Takagi, Yoneyama Takahiro, and Katsufumi Kujira. JP: 96193850, (1996).

Google Scholar

[10] Yoneyama Takahiro. JP: 09255629, (1997).

Google Scholar

[11] Qiang Zhao, Shuangming Meng, and Zhong Li. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2009, 28(7): 1175-1191. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] Hua Yuan, Mao Wu, and Weihua Wang. Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology, 2009, 25(2): 159-165. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[13] Xiaojun Yang, Yuanxin Wu, and Jinyu Han. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2009, 67(24): 2809-2814. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[14] Mao Wu, Hua Yuan, and Zhiping Du. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2008, 8(6): 1120-1125. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[15] Mao Wu, Hua Yuan, and Zhiping Du. Petrochemical technology, 2008, 37(12): 1248-1254. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] Junwei Ge, Zhiping Du, and Hua Yuan. Applied Chemical Industry, 2009, 38(1): 19-22. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[17] Fuming Mei, Guangxing Li, and Huibi Xu. Chinese Journal of Applied Chemistr, 2001, 18(9): 752-754. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[18] M. Takagi, H. Miyagi, and T. Yoneyama. J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem., 1998, 129, 1-3.

Google Scholar

[19] Ho Young Song, Eun Duck Park, and Jae Sung Lee. J Mol Cat A: Chemical, 2000, 154(1/2): 243-250.

Google Scholar

[20] Hongxia Guo, Hongping Chen, and Yinghua Liang. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 16(2): 223-227.

Google Scholar

[21] Hongxia Guo. Natural Gas Chemical Industry, 2012, 37(3): 18-22. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[22] G. W. Wu, Y.X. Wu, P.S. Ma, F. Jin , G.X. Zhang , D.H. Li, and C.W. Wang. J. Tianjin Univ., 2006, 39(4), 385-400.

Google Scholar

[23] Yinghua Liang, Hongxia Guo, and Hongping Chen. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 17(3): 401-406.

Google Scholar