Extension Mechanism Research of Vertical Hydraulic Fracture Cross Sand-Mudstone Interface

Article Preview

Abstract:

Propagation characteristics of crack cross different elastic material interface is important to hydrodynamic fracture of control technology .It makes the specimens of rock and similar materials including interfacial layer to do theItype crack through three-point bending experiments. The text shows that the crack occurred deflection through the interface. Based on damage mechanics, establish the plasticity damage model to describe the sand-mudstone damage behavior. Using the numerical solution technology to simulate the loading cracking process, the experimental and numerical simulation results are in good agreement. The main reason causing the fracture deflection is that the difference of sand-mudstone mechanics of materials property results in interface shear stress increasing, and result in the Itype crack expand transform to the I-IImixed type mode crack. TheII type shear crack makes the crack lateral spreading on the interface. Finally, leading to fracture deflection, the extent of deflection is associated with materials properties of mudstone, Shale content is more low, the deflection is more weak, and vice versa. It is important significance to controlling hydro-fracturing fracture extension.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 753-755)

Pages:

694-698

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wanshen Xiao, Guojin Tang, Jianping Zhou, etc. D-B model for interfacial crack in anisotropic elastic-plastic medium [J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2002, 24(2): 277~279, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Songmei Huang, Zheng Jian, Suqiang Ma, etc. Experimental investigation on fracture criterion for interface crack of concrete with different elastic properties [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1994, 6: 74-79, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] Ahmad J, A micromechanics analysis of cracks in unidirectional fiber composites[J]. Appl, Mech, 1991, 58(4): 964-972.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2897715

Google Scholar

[4] Jun Chang, Jinquan Xu. The singular stress field and stress intensity factors of a crack terminating at a biomaterial interface [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Science, 2007, 49: 888-897.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.11.009

Google Scholar

[5] A. Daneshy, Hydraulic Fracture Propagation in Layer Formations[C], 1978, SPE: 6088.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Gu, E. Siebrits and A. Sabourov, etc. Hydraulic Fracture Modeling With Bedding Plane Interfacial Slip[J]. 2008, SPE, 117445.

DOI: 10.2118/117445-ms

Google Scholar

[7] H. Gu, E. Siebrits and A. Sabourov, et al. Hydraulic Fracture Modeling With Bedding Plane Interfacial Slip[J]. 2008, SPE, 117445.

DOI: 10.2118/117445-ms

Google Scholar

[8] Yongming Li, Chongxi Li, Jianchun Guo. Analysis on the Influence Factors of Fracture Height of Sandstone Gas Reservoir Fracturing[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas technology, 2007, 29(2): 87-90, In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Yi Song, Impact of earth stress on vertical fracture height and technique of fracture height control[J]. Petroleum Geology Engineering , 2008, 22(21): 75-77 , In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Lubliner J, Oller S, etc. A plastic damage model for concrete. Int J Solids Struct, 1989, 25(3) 299-326.

Google Scholar