The Rejuvenating and Aging Performances of Aged SBS Modified Asphalt Treated by Different Rejuvenator Sealer Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

Currently, rejuvenator seal which is one of the preventive maintenance methods is more widely used due to its economic benefits and convenience. This paper described the chemical and rheological evaluation of the aged styrene butadiene styrene modified asphalt (ASMA) treated by two rejuvenator sealer materials (RSMs). First the ASMA was rejuvenated by mixing with the RSMs. Then the ASMA and two rejuvenated binders were re-aged by 10h PAV test. At last, the new binder, ASMA, rejuvenated ASMAs, re-aged binders were tested by Dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). The results showed that the first aging of the new binder had a significant decrease of the low temperature performance and slight improvement of the high temperature performance. In addition, the high temperature performance increased obviously after 10h PAV test. Two RSMs could significantly soften the aged binder due to increase of maltene content existing in the RSMs, and the rejuvenated binder exhibited a better low performance after the 10h PAV test. However they cannot restore the low temperature completely because that RSMs cannot remedy the degradation of SBS modifier and remove the carbonyl produced in the aging progress.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 753-755)

Pages:

734-740

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Nkorpnpon , P, Tom, F, and Glover C.J. Analyze existing fog seal asphalts and additives: literature review. FHWA/TX-06/0-5091-1. (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] T.F. Fwa. Evaluation of engineering benefits of Rjseal. A report prepared for Kalvani international Pte Ltd. (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] Brownridge J. The role of an asphalt rejuvenator in pavement preservation: use and need for asphalt rejuvenation. Compendium of papers from the first international conference on pavement preservation, California; 2010; 351–364.

Google Scholar

[4] Lin JT, Guo PD, Wan L. Laboratory investigation of rejuvenator seal materials on performances of asphalt mixtures. Constr Build Mater 2012; 37, 41-45.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.008

Google Scholar

[5] R. Romera, A. Santamaria, J,J. Pena. Rheological aspects of the rejuvenation of aed bitumen. Rheol Acta 2006; 45, 474-478.

DOI: 10.1007/s00397-005-0078-7

Google Scholar

[6] Shen JN, Ohne Ys, Determining rejuvenator content for recycling asphalt pavement by SHRP binder specifications.

DOI: 10.1080/1029843021000083685

Google Scholar

[7] Christopher D, Julian MB, You Z. P, properties of recovered asphalt binder blended with waste engine oil: A preliminary study. ASCE 2011; 4399-4406.

DOI: 10.1061/41186(421)433

Google Scholar

[8] Shen JN, Serji N. A and Lee S. J, HP-GPC Characterization of Rejuvenated Aged CRM Binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2007; 7; 515-522.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2007)19:6(515)

Google Scholar

[9] Asphalt Institute. Superpave performance graded asphalt binder specification and testing. Superpave, Series No. 1 (SP-1), Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY, USA; (2003).

DOI: 10.1520/stp12081s

Google Scholar

[10] Ferry JD. Viscoelastic properties of polymers. New York: Wiley; (1980).

Google Scholar

[11] Daranga, C. Characterization of aged polymer modified asphalt cements for recycling purposes., Dissertation of Louisiana State University, USA. (2005).

DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.588

Google Scholar