Optimization of Long Distance Natural Gas Pipeline Design Proposals Based on Multi-Objective AHM Method

Abstract:

the new method-AHM, and nine parameters which included diameter, delivery pressure, pressure ratio of the first station, pressure ratios of intermediate stations, number of stations, investment costs of pipeline ,investment costs of stations, investment costs of operation ,equivalent cost, have been selected to evaluate design projects of the long distance natural gas pipeline. The results indicate that attribute AHM matches other methods well. The calculation result of the example indicates that AHM method can get a good assessment result for the multifactor and multi-hierarchy complicated problems. The study provides a new method and technique for designers to select the technical feasible and economic reasonable design case, which has some theoretical and practical value.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 756-759)
• Pages: 4309-4313
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.756-759.4309
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Feng Juan Dong, Xue Fei Lu
• Keywords: AHM Method, Comprehensive Assessment, Design Proposals, Natural Gas Pipeline

References

[1] WANG Yuchun. Optimization in Oil and Gas Pipeline with Gray System Method [J]. Petroleum Planning & Engineering, 1993, 4(3): 27-30.

[2] XIAO Fangchun. Fuzzy Matter-Element Optimum for Transportation Programs of Natural Gas Network Systems[J]. Oil-Gasfield Surface Engineering, 1996, 16(3): 1-3.

[3] LIU Wu. Optimization of Long-distance Natural Gas Transportation Pipeline Design based on AHP Method [J]. Petroleum Planning & Engineering, 2002, 13(3): 22-24.

[4] LIU Wu. Study on Optimization of Long-distance Natural Gas Transportation Pipeline Design [J]. Oil&Gax Transporlation and Sponage, 2004, 22(3): 21-24.

[5] .

[5] NIE Tingzhe and DUAN Changgui. Natural Gas Pipeline Systems Design Based on Fuzzy Decision [J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation , 2003, 22(11): 28-31.

[6] WEN Tao, WANG Yuchun et al. Application of A Multi-valuation System for Gas Pipeline's EngineeringSchemes[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2005, 24(8): 10-14.

[7] SU Xin, HUANG Kun, YANG Hua, et al. Application of Fuzzy Analysis of Hierachical Process(FAHP) in Optimizing Cross Pipeline Selection[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2005, 27(6): 801-802.

[8] SU Xin, XIE Ying, YUAN Zongming, et al. Optimization of Long-distance Natural Gas Transportation Pipeline Design Based on Entropy-Weight Coefficient Method [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2007, 27(4): 112-114.

[9] LI Wanqing, MA Lihua, MENG Wenqing. Comprehensive evaluation model for the safety of fully mechanized mining face based on unascertainedmeasure and AHM [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2007, 32(6): 614-616.

[10] CHENG Qiansheng. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Attribute H ierarchical Model (AHM) [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice, 1998, 34(l) : 10-14.

[11] CHENG Qiansheng. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Att- ribute Hierarchical Model (AHM )[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice, 1997, (11) 25-28.

[12] CAI Huiping, CHENG Qiansheng. The Application of Attribute Hierarchical Model to Decision Making of Stock-Selection [J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2005, 35(3): 55-58.

[13] Ll Lianshui, WANG Guizhi, HUANG Xiao-rong et al. Meteorological Disaster Evaluation in AH M Research [J]. Journal of Applied Statisties and Management, 2011, 30(2): 201-205.

[14] CAI Zhenyu, LI Simin, REN Jian-hua, et al. Comprehensive Assessment of Urban Water Saving Level Based on AHM [J]. China Water&Wastewater, 2006, 22(7): 54-56.