Path Planning of Quadrotor Based on Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nowadays, it becomes a hot research topic for autonomous flight of Quadrotor in the complex environment and the realization of fully autonomous flight is still a big challenge. The path planning of unmanned aerial vehicle is a key problem for its autonomous flight. For the path planning of Quadrotor, using the quantum particle swarm optimization algorithm, and made a lot of simulation and actual flight experiments. The results of simulation and actual flight experiment show that the using of QPSO for the path planning of Quadrotor is able to obtain a satisfactory result.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 760-762)

Pages:

2018-2022

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Saiming Li, Beard R W, Autonomous Hierachical Control of Multiple UCAVs, In ACC, 2002, pp.274-279.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Zarchan, Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, AIAA Press, (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] Stentz A, Optimal and Efficient Path Planning for Partially-Known Environments, Proc. ICRA, Boston, MA, (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] Alighanbari M, Task assignment algorithms for teams of UAVs in dynamic environments, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] Asseo S J, Following/Terrain Avoidance Path Optimization Using the Method of Steepest Descent, NAECON, (1988).

DOI: 10.1109/naecon.1988.195148

Google Scholar

[6] P. Castillo, A. Dzul, R. Lozano, Real-time stabilization and tracking of a four rotor mini rotorcraft, J. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 12 (2006) 510-516.

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2004.825052

Google Scholar

[7] T. Hamel, R. Mahony, R. Lozano, Dynamic modeling and configuration stabilization for an X4-flyer, IFAC World Congr. , Barcelona, Spain, (2002).

DOI: 10.3182/20020721-6-es-1901.00848

Google Scholar

[8] H. Voos, Nonlinear state-dependent Riccati equation control of a quadrotor UAV, IEEE Conference on Control Applications, Munich, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/cca.2006.285869

Google Scholar

[9] S. Bouabdallah, R. Siegwart, Backstepping and Sliding-mode Techniques Applied to an Indoor Micro Quardrotor, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2005, p.2247–2252.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2005.1570447

Google Scholar

[10] A. Tayebi, S. McGilvray, Attitude stabilization of a VTOL quardrotor aircraft, J. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 14 (2006) 562-571.

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2006.872519

Google Scholar

[11] Holger Voos, Nonlinear Control of a Quadrotor Micro-UAV using Feedback-Linearza-tion, Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/icmech.2009.4957154

Google Scholar

[12] Bortoff S, Path Plannning for UAVs, Proc. of the American Control Conference, 2000, pp.364-368.

Google Scholar

[13] Petersson P, Doherty P, Probabilistic Roadmap based Path Plannning for an Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle, AAAI Workshop on Connecting Plannning Theory with Practice, ICAPS, 2004, pp.1-7.

Google Scholar

[14] Frazzoli E, Dahleh M A, Feron E, Real-time motion planning for agile autonomous vehicles, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, 2001, pp.43-49.

DOI: 10.1109/acc.2001.945511

Google Scholar