A Fuzzy-Dynamic-Programming Approach to the Scheduling of Cascaded Hydropower Plants

Article Preview

Abstract:

An optimization-based algorithm is presented for the optimal operation of hydropower systems with cascaded hydro-plants. Continuous reservoir dynamics and constraints, discrete operating states, and hydraulic coupling of cascaded hydro-plants are considered in an integrated way. The main idea is to decompose the cascaded hydro-plants into individual plants, and then use Fuzzy Dynamic Programming (FDP), rather traditional Dynamic Programming (DP), to solve the subproblem of each plant while considering the hydraulic coupling of the plants. Numerical test shows that this method converges very fast, and is efficient and effective to deal with hydropower system with cascaded hydro-plants.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 760-762)

Pages:

2028-2036

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Malekmohammadi, B. Zahraie, R.R. Kerachian. Ranking solutions of multi-objective reservoir operation optimization models using multi-criteria decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, 2011, pp: 7851–7863.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.119

Google Scholar

[2] H. Raman, and V. Chandramouli. Deriving a general operating policy for reservoirs using neural network. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., Vol. 122, No. 5, 1996, pp: 342-347.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1996)122:5(342)

Google Scholar

[3] B. Shrestha, L. Duckstein, and E. Stakhiv. Fuzzy rule-based modeling of reservoir operation. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., Vol: 122, No. 4, 1996, pp: 262-269.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1996)122:4(262)

Google Scholar

[4] A. Afshar, O. B. Haddad, M.A. Marino, B.J. Adams. Honey-bee mating optimization (HBMO) algorithm for optimal reservoir operation. Journal of the Franklin Institute, Vol. 344, 2007, pp: 452-462.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2006.06.001

Google Scholar

[5] B. Malekmohammadi, R. Kerachian, B. Zahraie. Developing monthly operating rules for a cascade system of reservoirs: application of bayesian networks. Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 24, 2009, pp: 1420–1432.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.008

Google Scholar

[6] M.H. Afshar. Large scale reservoir operation by Constrained Particle Swarm optimization algorithms. Journal of Hydro-environment Research, Vol. 6, 2012, pp: 75-87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jher.2011.04.003

Google Scholar

[7] J. Labadie. Optimal operation of multi-reservoir Systems: State-of the-Art Review. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., Vol. 130, No. 2, 2004, pp: 93-111.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2004)130:2(93)

Google Scholar

[8] S.Y.W. Wong. Hybrid simulated annealing/ genetic algorithm approach to short-term hydro-thermal scheduling with multiple thermal plants. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 23, 2001, pp: 565–575.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-0615(00)00029-6

Google Scholar

[9] M.H. Asiabar, S.H. Ghodsypour, and R. Kerachian. Multi-objective genetic local search algorithm using Kohonen's neural map. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 56, 2009, pp: 1566–1576.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2008.10.010

Google Scholar

[10] W. W. -G. Yeh. Reservoir management and operation models: a state-of-the-art review. Water Resources Research, Vol. 21, No. 12, 1985, pp: 1797-1818.

DOI: 10.1029/wr021i012p01797

Google Scholar

[11] S.J. Mousavi, M. Karamouz, F. ASCE, and M.B. Menhadj. Fuzzy-state stochastic dynamic programming for reservoir operation. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., Vol. 130, No. 6, 2004, pp: 460-470.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2004)130:6(460)

Google Scholar