Tuning of Ship Heading Controller Based on Minimum Rate of Energy Dissipation and Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The PID control is most widely used in industry and its parameters setting is an important issue in the field of automatic control. In this paper, a novel tuning strategy based on multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) and multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) method was proposed. The proposed strategy can balance the four performances simultaneously regarding accurate set-point tracking, disturbance attenuation, robust stability and energy consumption for actuator. The estimated Pareto-optimal set was obtained by MOGA and then an appropriate solution was selected from the set by ranking with a simple additive weighting method (SAW). To demonstrate the proposed strategy, an example of the ship course PID controller with filter for a 150,000-ton tanker with steering gear was studied. The results show that the PID controller is stable and robust with high dynamic quality.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 765-767)

Pages:

1951-1955

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] W. Tan, T. Chen, H. J. Marquez, Robust controller design and PID tuning for multivariable processes [J]. Asian J. Control, 2002 4 (4) 439-451.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1934-6093.2002.tb00085.x

Google Scholar

[2] Helon Vicente Hultmann Ayala and so on. Tuning of PID controller based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm applied to a robotic manipulator [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012 (39) 8968-8974.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.027

Google Scholar

[3] Sidhartha Panda, Multi-objective PID controller tuning for a FACTS-based damping stabilizer using Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II [J]. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 2011 (33) 1296-1308.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.06.002

Google Scholar

[4] Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, Jih-Jeng Huang. Multiple attribute decision making. Boca Raton: CRC Press, (2011).

Google Scholar

[5] ZHANG Xianku and so on. Research on responding ship motion mathematical model [J] Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2004 2 (30) 18- 21. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Xinle JIA and Yansheng Yang, Ship motion mathematical model: mechanism model and ferreting modeling, Dalian maritime university press, 1999. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Yao Zhen and so on. Design and Simulation of Ship Course Controller Based on Auto Disturbance Rejection Control Technique [C]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/ical.2009.5262835

Google Scholar

[8] Ala Eldin Abdallah Awouda, Rosbi Bin Mamat New PID tuning rule using ITAE criteria [J]. International Journal of Engineering, 2010 3 (6) 1-11.

DOI: 10.1109/iccae.2010.5451484

Google Scholar

[9] C.E. Shannon, W. Weaver, The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press, (1947).

Google Scholar