Improvement of Oxygen Releasing Compounds Amended with Modified Oil Sludge

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of modified oil sludge (MOS), CaO2 and bentonite amounts on the performance of oxygen releasing compounds (ORCs) has been investigated. Results showed that MOS was the primary factor to affect the ORCs performance. Increasing the amount of MOS resulted in extension of the lifetime of ORC; instead, decreasing it would obtain relatively large stable oxygen release rate. Moreover, addition of MOS made significant decrease in initial oxygen release rate. Compared with ORCs without MOS, ORCs with 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% MOS had initial oxygen release rates reduced by 15%, 40%, 65% and 65%, respectively. Another characteristic of the MOS was also found. It proved that precipitates generating from oxygen-releasing process, such as calcium and magnesium minerals, could hardly accumulate on the surface of ORC. Addition of MOS reduced the clogging of oxygen diffusion channels caused by the mineral deposition on the surface of ORC; thus, extended the lifetime. The ORC that replaced bentonite with MOS was economical and environment-friendly. One available ORC contained CaO2 (30%), MOS (5%), cement (30%) and sand (35%); and its stable oxygen release rate was 0.146 g [O2]/(kg [OR·d) and the lifetime was 187 d.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 765-767)

Pages:

2938-2943

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.J. Moran, J.S. Zogorski and P.J. Squillace: Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 41 (2007), pp.74-81.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Yamane, K. Sakakibara, M. Hosomi and A. Murakami: Water Sci. Technol., Vol. 35 (1997), pp.69-76.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Martienssen and M. Schirmer, in: 9th International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium 2007, Vol. 1, pp.273-278, Battelle Press (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] J.E. Odencrantz, J.G. Johnson and S.S. Koenigsberg: Remediation, Vol. 6 (1996), pp.99-114.

Google Scholar

[5] M.J. Barcelona and G.B. Xie: Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 35 (2001), pp.3378-3385.

Google Scholar

[6] R.D. Wilson, D.M. Mackay and K.M. Scow: Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 36 (2002), pp.190-199.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.K. Kunukcu: J. Environ. Sci. Health, Pt. A, Vol. 42 (2007), pp.839-845.

Google Scholar

[8] E. Abdallah, A.A. Goncalves and G. A Gagnon: J. Environ. Sci. Health, Pt. A, Vol. 44 (2009), pp.707-713.

Google Scholar

[9] C.M. Kao, S.C. Chen and M.C. Su: Chemosphere, Vol. 44 (2001), pp.925-934.

Google Scholar

[10] C.M. Kao, S.C. Chen, J.Y. Wang, Y.L. Chen and S.Z. Lee: Water Res., Vol. 37 (2003), pp.27-38.

Google Scholar

[11] L. Xie, F. Liu and Y.L. Liu: Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol. 33 (2010), pp.44-48, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Hollabaugh and I.R. Schaffner Jr, U.S. Patent 7, 468, 469. (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] C.H. Yeh, C.W. Lin and C.H. Wu: J. Hazard. Mate., Vol. 178 (2010), pp.74-80.

Google Scholar

[14] T. Schmidtke, D. White and C. Woolard: J. Hazard. Mater., Vol. 64 (1999), pp.157-165.

Google Scholar

[15] S.J. Liu, B. Jiang, X.G. Li and J.Y. Lian: China Water and Wastewater, Vol. 25 (2009), pp.79-82, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[16] V. Plagentz, D. Schafer, R. Kober, F. Dethlefsen, M. Ebert and A. Dahmke: GRUNDWASSER, Vol. 11 (2006), pp.259-269, in German.

DOI: 10.1007/s00767-006-0155-6

Google Scholar

[17] H. Li, Y.H. Liu, N. Luo, X.Y. Zhang, T.G. Luan, J.M. Hu, Z.Y. Wang, P.C. Wu, M.J. Chen and J.Q. Lu: Res. Microbiol., Vol. 157 (2006), pp.629-636.

Google Scholar

[18] A. Fahy, A.S. Ball, G. Lethbridge, K.N. Timmis and T.J. McGenity: Lett. Appl. Microbiol., Vol. 47 (2008), pp.60-66.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02386.x

Google Scholar

[19] Y.H. Li, Y.L. Liu, H. Deng and S.L. Zhang: Adv. Mater. Res., Vol. 599 (2012), pp.412-417.

Google Scholar

[20] Information on http: /kjs. mep. gov. cn/hjbhbz/bzwb/gthw.

Google Scholar