Geometrical variations of tubes and their impact on freeform bending processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

In bending processes for tubes and profiles, the produced bending geometry depends on the characteristics of the semifinished product. Tubes are subjected to scatter and deviations from the standard’s dimensions caused by their fabrication process. This results in deviations of the forming behaviour. Depending on the bending process, the effect of this phenomenon is even larger, if the deviation of process forces leads to a significant deflection of the die elements. Particularly kinematic bending processes, e. g. the 3-roll-push-bending process have shown to be highly sensitive to low machine stiffness. The effect of this factor has not been identified among the influences of other disturbance factors so far. As an additional aspect, the tube dimensions affect the material characterization which leads to inaccurate material properties in numerical simulations. This results in wrong input data for the process design and has to be corrected in lengthy adjustment procedures. In this contribution the scatter of some geometrical tubes properties and its impact on the 3-roll-push-bending process is investigated. The tube geometry is measured by a tactile measurement system and is compared to the product standards. Observed deviations are categorized according to DIN 4760. The impact of the deviations on the bending process is examined by numerical variant calculations. Besides the tube dimensions, the stiffness of the machine is varied and the influence determined. By considering the errors resulting from wrong input data in the material characterization the overall error is quantified.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

181-188

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Vollertsen, A. Sprenger, J. Kraus, H. Arnet, Extrusion, channel, and profile bending: a review, J. Materials Process. Tech., 87(1999)1, 1–27.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00339-2

Google Scholar

[2] R. Plettke, P.H. Vatter, D. Vipavc, Basics of Process Design for 3D freeform bending, Steel research international: 14th Int. Conf. on Metal Forming (2012), 307–301.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Gantner, H. Bauer, D.K. Harrison, A.K.M. De Silva, Free-Bending – A new bending technique in the hydroforming process chain, J. Materials Process. Tech., 167 (2005) 2–3, 302–308.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.052

Google Scholar

[4] H. Goto, K. Ichiryu, H. Saito, Applications with a New 6-DOF Bending Machine in Tube Forming Processes, 7th JFPS Int. Symposium on Fluid Power (2008), 183–188.

DOI: 10.5739/isfp.2008.183

Google Scholar

[5] H. Hagenah, D. Vipavc, R. Plettke, M. Merklein, Numerical Model of Tube Freeform Bending by Three-Roll-Push-Bending, Int. Conf. on Engineering Optimization (2010), 1–10.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84996-432-6_5

Google Scholar

[6] B. Engel, S. Kersten, Sensitivitätsanalyse beim Freiformbiegen von Rohrprofilen, 30. EFB-Kolloquium Blechverarbeitung (2010), 123–138.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Strano, B.M. Colosimo, E. Del Castillo, Improved design of a three roll tube bending process under geometrical uncertainties, AIP Conference Proceedings 35(2011), 35–40.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3589488

Google Scholar

[8] M. Cojutti, D. Vipavc, H. Hagenah, M. Merklein, An innovative approach for the process design for three-roll bending of plain tubular components, Proc. Int. Congress on Efficient Rollforming (2009), 133–139.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.410-411.325

Google Scholar

[9] N.N., DIN EN ISO 6892:2007: Metallische Werkstoffe – Zugversuch – Prüfverfahren bei Raumtemperatur, Beuth, Berlin, 2007.

DOI: 10.31030/3132591

Google Scholar

[10] N.N., DIN EN 10305: Präzisionsstahlrohre – Technische Lieferbed., Beuth, Berlin, 2010.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Böge, Technische Mechanik: Statik - Dynamik - Fluidmechanik - Festigkeitslehre, Springer, Berlin, 2011.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-25724-8_6

Google Scholar

[12] A. Quarteroni, Scientific Computing with Matlab and Octave, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2006.

Google Scholar

[13] N.N., DIN 4760: Gestaltabweichungen - Begriffe, Ordnungssystem, Beuth, Berlin, 1982.

DOI: 10.31030/1110827

Google Scholar

[14] M. Merklein, P. Vatter, R. Plettke, M. Grüner, Einfluss der Fließkurve auf den Rohrbiegeradius, Werkstattstechnik online, Springer VDI, Düssledorf, 10(2012), 689-695.

DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2012-10-689

Google Scholar