Order Penetration Point: Just a Stock within Production?

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nowadays, for customers the logistical performance of industrial companies is as important as the price and quality when buying decisions have to be made. It can be observed that considering the KPIs of logistical performance as quality figures, similar to the product quality, becomes quite popular within national and international markets. Two logistical performance key figures that can be pointed out in that context are short lead times and high schedule reliability. The delivery times demanded by markets often are shorter than the realizable lead times of products or the replenishment time of raw materials or purchased parts. In order to deliver the products in time, companies have the opportunity to implement so called order penetration point (OPP) within their productions. The OPP specifies the point within a production which connects upstream processes linked with work orders and downstream processes link with costumer orders. The OPP is often built up as a stock of unfinished goods. Currently companies position their OPP only with the goal to satisfy the demand of short lead times set by the market. Other logistical targets such as a low work-in-process (WIP), high schedule reliability or a high utilization are usually not taken into account. Hence, due to the complexity of positioning the OPP companies underestimate the logistical potentials that can be achieved by positioning the OPP optimally. In this publication the fundamental determining factors which both influence the position of the OPP and are influenced by the selected position of the OPP are presented. In particular the dependencies between the four logistical targets, lead time, WIP, schedule reliability and the grade of utilization, and the position of the OPP are discussed. Exemplarily the correlation between the position of OPP and the schedule adherence at the end of the supply chain are presented. It can be assumed that the schedule adherence increases by moving the OPP towards the end of the supply chain. Possible reasons that explain this particular effect, like the reduction of lead time variation, will be discussed in detail.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

367-373

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. Sharman, The rediscovery of logistics, Harvard Business Review 84 (1984) 71-80.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Zäpfel, Auftragsgetriebene Produktion zur Bewältigung der Nachfrageungewißheit, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 66 (1996) 861-877.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Olhager, Strategic positioning of the order penetration point, International Journal of Production Economics 85 (2003) 319-329.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(03)00119-1

Google Scholar

[4] J. Olhager, J. Wikner, A framework for integrated material and capacity based master scheduling, in: A. Drexl; A. Kimms (Eds.), Beyond Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP II): Advanced Models and Methods for Production Planning, Springer, Berlin, 1998, pp.3-20.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03742-3_1

Google Scholar

[5] Q. H. Yang, G. N. Qi, Y. J. Lu, X. J. Gu, Applying mass customization to the production of industrial steam turbines. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 20 (2007) 178-188.

DOI: 10.1080/09511920601020698

Google Scholar

[6] J. Wikner, M. M. Naim, M. Rudberg, Exploiting the Order Book for Mass Customized Manufacturing Control Systems With Capacity Limitations, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 54 (2007) 145-155.

DOI: 10.1109/tem.2006.889073

Google Scholar

[7] J. Wikner, M. Rudberg, Integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling point, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25 (2005) 623-641.

DOI: 10.1108/01443570510605072

Google Scholar

[8] M. Röhrig, Variantenbeherrschung mit hochflexiblen Produktionsendstufen, Diss. Univ. Hannover, VDI Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf, 2002.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Winkler, Beitrag zur Positionierung von Kundenentkopplungspunkten in Produktionsnetzwerken, Verlag Praxiswissen, Dortmund, 2010.

Google Scholar