Gamification in Management Decisions: Judging Global Production Networks in a Cyber-Physical Way

Article Preview

Abstract:

The judgment of global production networks is facing three major challenges. The complexity, measurable through the huge solution space, as well as the time-consuming preparation of a decision in line with the limited amount of time of the final decision makers – CEOs and upper management. The experience from several industry projects showed the demand to transfer and apply the concept of gamification in a cyber-physical environment to decision-making in Global Footprint Design. Smart IT tools, which support the intuition and practical knowledge of the decision maker but do not finally make the decision for them, are needed. Based on general criteria for successful gamified IT tools three specific requirements for judging global production networks are derived: value creation, ludic goal orientation and autonomous discovery. The major challenges and these specified principles of gamification are addressed within the scope of an IT tool which simplifies and improves complex global footprint decisions by employing elements of gamification. It is analysed to which degree the criteria are already fulfilled, which benefits this prototype of a gamified IT tool can offer and what future research has to be conducted in order to fully let CEOs game their global footprint strategy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

327-334

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] IBM, Führen durch Vernetzung – Ergebnisse der Global Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Study, 2012.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Ariely, Predictably irrational, HarperCollings, New York, 2009.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Schuh,T. Potente, D. Kupke, R. Varandani, Innovative Approaches for Global Production Networks, in: K. Windt (ed.), Robust Manufacturing Control, Lecture Notes in Production Engineering, Springer, Berlin, 2013, pp.385-397.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30749-2_28

Google Scholar

[4] M. Nöllke, Entscheidungen treffen, Haufe, Freiburg, 2007.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Iyengar, How to make choosing easier, http://www.ted.com/talks/sheena_iyengar_choosing_what_to_choose.html, Access: 05.02.13

DOI: 10.1037/e516042012-001

Google Scholar

[6] E. Abele, et al., Global Production – A Handbook for Strategy and Implementation, Springer, New York, 2008.

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Yue, An avoiding information loss approach to group decision making, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (2013) 112-126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.008

Google Scholar

[8] G. Schuh,T. Potente, R. Varandani, A.Klein, H. Timm, Die Welt als grüne Wiese, VDI-Z 154 (2012) 36-39.

Google Scholar

[9] S.P. Sing, Gamification: A Strategic Tool for Organizational Effectiveness, ANVESHAK International Journal of Management, Vol.1, No.1 (2012) 108-114.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, L. Nacke, From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification", Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments 2011, 9-15.

DOI: 10.1145/2181037.2181040

Google Scholar

[11] M.A. Moradian, K. Lyons, M. Nasir, R. Leung, Gamifying Collaborative Decision Making, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, 2012.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Deterding, Meaningful play, Google Tech Talk, Jan. 2011, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZGCPap7GkY, Access: 05.02.13.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Schuh, et al., An integrated approach for global production network optimisation, 22nd Conference on Computer-Aided Production Engineering (CAPE), Edinburgh, 2011.

Google Scholar