The Amorphous/Crystalline Silicon Interface Research of HIT Solar Cells by Simulation

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, we have focused on the influence of interface state density and band offsets on the performance of HIT solar cells by simulation. The interface state density Dit have negative influence on the open-circuit voltage VOC, fill factor FF and the short circuit current JSC, beyond different Dit respectively. VOC decreases monotonically with increasing Dit only when Dit is greater than 1010 cm-2, and for FF and JSC Dit is 1012 cm-2, 1013 cm-2, respectively. Observed reduction in VOC (Dit is from 1×1010 cm-2 to 5×1013 cm-2) may be due to the enhanced recombination possibility, which diminishes the difference in quasi Fermi energies from 0.8 eV to 0.46 eV. Reduction of JSC (Dit is from 1×1013 cm-2 to 5×1013 cm-2) is connected with the carrier recombination rate that is heightened from 2.43×1024cm-3/s to 3.1×1026cm-3/s, which is markedly by two orders of magnitude. In addition, our research results demonstrate that by increasing the conduction band offset EC (from 0.09eV to 0.15 eV), the VOC could be increased by 15.9 mV, while the performance of HIT solar cells is not affected by the valence band offset EV. The increase of EC results in the rising of Vbi and thus improves VOC. It is worth mention that, the recombination potential VRe could be decreased from 232 meV to 208 meV by the increase of EC (from 0.09eV to 0.15eV) and thus is favorable to VOC. Consequently, when the interface state density is less than 1010 cm-2 and the conduction band offset reaches 0.15eV, we can optimize the performance of HIT solar cells to achieve 24.95% efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

124-131

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Atsuhiko Fukuyama , Daisuke Ishibashi , Yohei Sato, et al, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Vol. 358 (2012), pp.2206-2208.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Luque, S. Hegedus, Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, (2011).

Google Scholar

[3] A. Descoeudres, L. Barraud, Stefaan De Wolf, et al, APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, Vol. 99 (2011), pp.123506-3.

Google Scholar

[4] Stefaan De Wolf, Sara Olibet, and Christophe Ballif, Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 93 (2008), pp.032101-3.

Google Scholar

[5] Stefaan De Wolf and Michio Kondo, J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 105 (2009), pp.103707-1–103707-6.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Zhao, C.L. Zhou, H.L. Li, et al, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells Vol. 92 (2008), pp.673-681.

Google Scholar

[7] Antara Datta, J. Damon-Lacoste, P. Roca i Cabarrocas , P. Chatterjee, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells, Vol. 92 (2008), pp.1500-1507.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.015

Google Scholar

[8] Vinh Ai Dao, Jongkyu Heo, Hyungwook Choi, et al, Solar Energy, Vol. 84 (2010), pp.777-783.

Google Scholar

[9] Wang Jianqiang, Gao Hua, Zhang Jian, et al, Journal of Semiconductors, Vol. 33(3), (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] N. Jensen, R.M. Hausner, R.B. Berman, J.H. Werner, U. Rau, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Vol. 10 (2002), pp.1-13.

Google Scholar

[11] T.H. Wang, M.R. Page, E. Iwaniczko, D.H. Levi, Y. Yan, H.M. Branz, and Q. Wang, the 14th Workshop on Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells and Modules,200408, pp.1-8.

Google Scholar

[12] Hidenori M, Yoshinori H. Appl Phys Lett, Vol. 50 (1987), p.326.

Google Scholar

[13] Lequeux N, Cuniot M. J Non-Cryst Solids, Vol. 114(2), p.555, (1989).

Google Scholar

[14] M.C. Delfina, Dr. Thesis. Department d'Enginyeria ElectrÒnica, Universitat Politècnica De Catalunya. Available from: <http: /www. tdr. cesca. es/TESIS_UPC/AVAILABLE/ TDX-1106108-132529/01Dmc01de01. pdf>, (2008).

Google Scholar

[15] S. M. Sze, Kwok K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (Third Edition), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, (2007).

Google Scholar