Design of Products and Processes: A Perspective from the Pyramid Model of Value System

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper started with the review of the evolvement of industrial engineering and illustrated the new problems encountered in modern industrial engineering. By using the Seven Elements Pyramid Model in the new generation of value engineering, researchers and practitioners are able to discover the sources and processes of value generation. Moreover, since human resource is an indispensible part of value engineering, we find it is in great need of new research methods to study workers’ physiological and psychological status in the course of work. Therefore, neuroscience methods are introduced into the modern industrial engineering, creating the new field of Neural Industrial Engineering (NeuroIE).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 774-776)

Pages:

1971-1974

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Maynard H B. Industrial engineering handbook[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, (1963).

Google Scholar

[2] Hendrick H W. Ergonomics in organizational design and management[J]. Ergonomics, 1991, 34(6): 743-756.

DOI: 10.1080/00140139108967348

Google Scholar

[3] Ma Q, Ji W, Fu H, et al. Neuro–industrial engineering: the new stage of modern IE-from the human–oriented perspective[J]. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics, 2012, 7(2): 150-166.

DOI: 10.1504/ijsoi.2012.051398

Google Scholar

[4] Hollands J G, Wickens C D. Engineering psychology and human performance[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] Miles L D. Value engineering[M]. Verlag Moderne Industrie, (1967).

Google Scholar

[6] Ma Q. The development of value engineering theoretical system in the new period. In the fourth value engineering conference between Chinese mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] Porter M E. How competitive forces shape strategy[M]. Harvard Business Review, (1979).

Google Scholar

[8] Parasuraman R, Rizzo M. Neuroergonomics: The brain at work[M]. Oxford University Press, Inc., (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] Glimcher P W, Rustichini A. Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 2004, 306: 447—452.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1102566

Google Scholar

[10] Ma Q, Shang Q, Bian J, et al. A research on the application of physiological status information to productivity enhancement[M]/Electrical Engineering and Control. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011: 801-808.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-21765-4_100

Google Scholar

[11] Ma Q, Ji W, Fu H, et al. Neuro–industrial engineering: the new stage of modern IE-from the human–oriented perspective[J]. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics, 2012, 7(2): 150-166.

DOI: 10.1504/ijsoi.2012.051398

Google Scholar

[12] Zhou X H, Wang L, Hu Y C. Neuro-Industrial Engineering: Research and Practice[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 268: 2022-(2025).

Google Scholar