Earthquake Response Monitoring and Structural Analysis of Traditional Japanese Timber Temple

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper introduces the recent attempts to clarify the seismic behavior of traditional timber architecture. The subject of the research is a timber temple, Kencho-ji, in Japan, designated as important cultural property. The temple was affected by the Great Kanto Earthquake 1923. There are two main halls in the Kencho-ji temple, and one of them collapsed while the other slightly inclined. The two main halls have similar structures, and stand next to each other. The authors have been trying to clarify the reason for the difference in the damage for the past ten years through on-sight measurement, micro tremor test, earthquake monitoring and structural analysis. As there is very few information concerning the hidden detail of the joints, recently the authors have operated X-ray inspection. The paper introduces the result of the X-ray test and the structural analysis using the result of the newly revealed hidden joint is discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

823-828

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Ohashi, Seismic performance of Butsuden and Hatto of Kencho-ji, Report of the Grant in Aid for Scientific Research (B), The ministry of Education, (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Koshihara, K. Fujita, Y. Ohashi and I. Sakamto, A Study on Damages of Traditional Wooden Buildings in Kamakura by the 1923 Kanto Earthquake, Journal of Journal of structural and construction engineering. Transactions of AIJ (573), pp.129-135, Architectural Institute of Japan, 30 November (2003).

DOI: 10.3130/aijs.68.129_3

Google Scholar

[3] A. Ibaraki, K. Chiba, H. Hayashi, T. Sato and K. Fujita, Earthquake Monitoring and Structural Analysis of Butsuden and Hatto of Kencho-ji temple, Proceeding of International Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8, pp.336-337, Nov. (2011).

Google Scholar