Study on Resistance to Sulphate Attack of Polymer Modified Sulphoaluminate Cement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Styrene-acrylic emulsion was synthesized by pre-emulsification and semi-continuous emulsion polymerization, with styrene and butyl acrylate as monomers. The effects of initiator dosage and ratio of polymer to cement on durability of polymeric sulphoaluminate cement were investigated. SEM, pore structure and resistance to sulfate attack were also studied. The results show that the total porosity of the polymer sulphoaluminate hardened cement paste is lowest when P/C is 7.5%. Innocuous pores of the hardened paste are the least when P/C is 5.0%. It shows that polymer particles can spread around the cement paste, and polymer particles, aggregates, hydration products and pores come into being a compact mass. Flexural strength is higher when initiator dosage is 5‰ than that is 4‰. Flexural strength is the highest when initiator dosage is 5‰ and P/C is 7.5%, in other words, the performance of resistance to sulfate attack is best when initiator dosage is 5‰ and P/C is 7.5%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 79-82)

Pages:

961-964

Citation:

Online since:

August 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2009 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] WANG Peiming, XU Qi and Stark J. Journal of Building Materials. Vol. 4 (2001), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] Joachim Schulze, Otmar Killermann. Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 31(2001), p.357.

Google Scholar

[3] Etsuo Sakai, Jun Sugita. Cement and Concrete Research. Vol. 251(1995), p.127.

Google Scholar

[4] YUAN Guanglin, YUAN Yingshu. Industrial Construction. Vol. 2 (1997), p.25.

Google Scholar

[5] LIANG Naixing: Polymer Modified Cement Concrete. (The Traffic Press, Wuhan1995).

Google Scholar

[6] HONG Dinghai. Journal of Building Materials. Vol. 1 (1998), p.271.

Google Scholar

[7] YE Zhengmao, LU Lingchao. China Building Waterproofing. Vol. 8 (2005), p.23.

Google Scholar