The Effect of LZB-GC Antibacterial Agent on Mechanics and Friction Properties of Dental Composite Resin

Article Preview

Abstract:

The antibacterial agent (LZB-GC) was added to composite resin materials with varied ratio (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2%) by mechanical and ultrasonic methods. The effects of different contents of the antibacterial agent on the mechanical and fibration properties of the composite resin were measured. The results showed 1.5% group acquired the best flexural strength, and the surface hardness decreased while the friction coefficient increased with improving the antibacterial agent content.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 791-793)

Pages:

299-302

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jack L. Ferracane. Resin composite—State of the art[J]. Dental materials, 2011, 27: 29-38.

Google Scholar

[2] Flavia Goncalves, Caio L.N. Azevedo, Jack L. Ferracane, et al. BisGMA/TEGDMA ratio and filler content effects on shrinkage stress[J]. Dental materials, 2011, 27: 520-526.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.01.007

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang Linqi, Gao Bo, Tang Lihui, Chen Gang. The influence of nanometer inorganic filling carrying silver on the properties of composite resin[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2006, 15: 1, 73-76.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Z. Kassaee, A. Akhavan, N. Sheikh, A. Sodagar. Antibacterial Effects of a New Dental Acrylic Resin Containing Silver Nanoparticles[J]. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 2008, 110: 1699-1703.

DOI: 10.1002/app.28762

Google Scholar

[5] Jennifer L. Moreau, Limin Sun, Laurence C. Chow. Mechanical and acid neutralizing properties and bacteria inhibition of amorphous calcium phosphate dental nanocomposite[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2011, 98B: 80-88.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31834

Google Scholar

[6] Iwao Ikejima, Rie Nomoto, John F. McCabe. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation[J]. Dental materials, 2003, 19: 206-211.

DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00031-3

Google Scholar

[7] Zhong Yuxiu, Ni Longxing, Jiang Yong, Xie Houguang. Effects of nano-diamond filler on compressive strength and microhardness of composite resin[J]. Stomotology, 2005, 25(3): 154-155.

Google Scholar

[8] Wang Likai, Shi Lianshui, Zhu Hongshui. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of three kinds of new composite resins[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2008, 26(1): 15-18.

Google Scholar

[9] Fulya Toksoy Topcu, Ugur Erdemir, Gunes Sahinkesen, et al. Evaluation of microhardness, surface roughness, and wear behavior of different types of resin composites polymerized with two different light sources[J]. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2010, 92B: 470-478.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31540

Google Scholar

[10] Say EC, Civelek A, Nobecourt A, et al. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials[J]. Oper Dent, 2003, 28(5): 628- 634.

Google Scholar

[11] Yap AU, Chew CL, Ong LF, et al. Environmental damage and occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2002, 29(1): 87- 97.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00797.x

Google Scholar

[12] Zhang huaiqin, Chao Yonglie. The research progress of composite resin[J]. Foreign Medical Sciences, 2005, 32(1): 23-24.

Google Scholar