The Comparison of Different Preparation Methods of Catalysts for Furfural Hydrogenization to 2 - Methyl Furan

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three different kinds of preparation methods were contrasted and studied to furfural hydrogenation catalyst for 2 - methyl furan production.Cu, Cr-based catalysts are prepared by three different methods, and the differences were also studied in the structure of these catalysts and their catalytic properties on furfural hydrogenation reaction. From the XRD patterns of samples prepared by different methods of Cu-Cr/γ-Al2O3, The results show that: the metal particle size is:the ordinary impregnation method > coprecipitation > solvated metal atom impregnation method. From the SEM photographs by samples, distribution uniformity of the catalyst ion surface: ordinary impregnation method > coprecipitation > solvated metal atom impregnation method. The reduction degree of the metal: solvated metal atom impregnation ordinary impregnation coprecipitation method. Furfural hydrogenation experimental results show that the order of catalytic activity is solvated metal atom > general impregnation coprecipitation; the selectivity order of 2 - methyl furan: coprecipitation> ordinary impregnation method solvated metal atom impregnation method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 791-793)

Pages:

68-71

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Adkins H., Conner R. Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 44(1931), pp.71-72.

Google Scholar

[2] Essein M.K. Tians Inst Mining Met Sect C, Vol. 80, No. (772)(1971), pp.7-11.

Google Scholar

[3] Chunzhi Zheng, Guohua Zhang, Guoan Li. Journal of Liaoning Chemical Industry, Vol. 29(2) , No. (2000), pp.71-72.

Google Scholar

[4] Jun Yang and Hongyan Zheng. Journal of Modern Chemical Industry, Vol. 24, No. (9) (2004), p.19.

Google Scholar

[5] Shihua Wu, Wei Wei, Bao-qing, etal. Journal of Catalysis, Vol. 24, No. (1)(2003), pp.27-31.

Google Scholar

[6] Hongshan Luo, Li Zhuang . Journal of Molecular Catalysis, Vol. 16, No. (1)(2003), pp.49-54.

Google Scholar

[7] Yaling Sun, Changhai Du, Dan Zou , et al. Journal of Chemical Engineer, Vol. 39, No. (1)(2010), pp.10-15.

Google Scholar

[8] Weiwei Lu and Xian-Lun Xu. Journal of Molecular Catalysis, Vol. 20 , No. (1)(2006), pp.67-69.

Google Scholar

[9] Yan Ling, Jing Wu and Yanming Shen. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Chemical Technology, Vol. 16, No. (2) (2002), pp.95-98.

Google Scholar

[10] Jingbo Yin, Xue-Si Chen, Long Zhang. Journal of Chemical Research of Chinese Universities, Vol. 23, No. (7) (2002), pp.1363-1366.

Google Scholar