Negative Spillover Effects of Product-Harm Crisis on Category: Moderating Role of Crisis-Involvement

Article Preview

Abstract:

Product-harm crisis can seriously hurt a firms performance, has a negative impact on entire category. However, do negative spillover effects on category differ when the characteristics of product-harm crisis are varied To verify this question, we conducted a scenario-based experiment and found: The more severe product-harm crisis, the more negative spillover effects on category. High crisis information involvement would cause consumers more changes of category attitude. Meanwhile the impact of crisis severity on category spillover effects will be moderated by the crises-involvement. Based on these findings, we talk about their marketing practice values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 798-799)

Pages:

877-880

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ahluwalia, R., Unnava, H. R., Burnkrant, R. E. The Moderating Role of Commitment on the Spillover Effect of Marketing Communications. J. Journal of Marketing Research, 2001, XXXVIII (9): 458-470.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.458.18903

Google Scholar

[2] Roehm, M. L., Tybout, A. M. When Will a Brand Scandal Spill Over and How Should Competitors Respond J. Journal of Marketing Research, 2006, XLIII (7): 366–373.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkr.43.3.366

Google Scholar

[3] Dahlen, M., Lange, F. A Disaster Is Contagious: How a Brand in Crisis Affects Other Brands. J. Journal of Advertising Research, 2006, 46 (4): 388.

DOI: 10.2501/s0021849906060417

Google Scholar

[4] Feldman, J. M., Lynch, J. G. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J. Journal of applied Psychology, 1988, 73 (3): 421.

DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421

Google Scholar

[5] Siomkos, G., Triantafillidou, A., Vassilikopoulou, A. Opportunities and threats for competitors in product-harm crises. J. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 2010, 28 (6): 770-791.

DOI: 10.1108/02634501011078156

Google Scholar

[6] Mitchell, A. A. The use of an information processing approach to understand advertising effects. J. Advances in Consumer Research, 1980, 7 (1): 171-176.

Google Scholar

[7] Andrews, J. C. Motivation, ability, and opportunity to process information: Conceptual and experimental manipulation issues. J. Advances in Consumer Research, 1988, 15 (1): 219-225.

Google Scholar

[8] Quester, P., Lim, A. L. Product involvement/brand loyalty: is there a link? J. Journal of product & brand management, 2003, 12 (1): 22-38.

DOI: 10.1108/10610420310463117

Google Scholar

[9] Coombs, W. T., Holladay, S. J. Helping Crisis Managers Protect Reputational Assets Initial Tests of the Situational Crisis Communication Theory. J. Management Communication Quarterly, 2002, 16 (2): 165-186.

DOI: 10.1177/089331802237233

Google Scholar

[10] Fombrun, C., Riel, C. v. The reputational landscape. J. Corporate Reputation Review, 1997: 1-16.

Google Scholar

[11] Siomkos, G. J., Kurzbard, G. The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis management. J. European Journal of Marketing, 1994, 28 (2): 30-41.

DOI: 10.1108/03090569410055265

Google Scholar

[12] Zaichkowsky, J. L. Measuring the involvement construct. J. Journal of Consumer Research, 1985: 341-352.

Google Scholar