Analysis on Cooperation and Competition Behavior of Enterprises Based on Evolutionary Game - The Case Studies of Chinese Creative Industrial Clusters

Article Preview

Abstract:

In recent years, not only the academics pays close attention to the creative industries, but also enterprises and the government keep a watchful eye on it. Cooperation and competition behaviors of enterprises will decide their competitiveness directly, thereby affecting the competitiveness and future direction of our creative industries. In this paper, based on cooperation and competition behavior in creative industrial clusters, we establish symmetric game model between two core enterprises and asymmetric game model between the core enterprise and the adjacent down-stream one by using evolutionary game theory, then analyze its dynamic evolutionary procedure. The result show that the systems evolutionary direction is closely related to players payoff, and influenced by cooperation profit, initial cost of the cooperation, capacity for independent innovation, cooperation successful rate and systems initial status. At last, some suggestions are offered for our government which can provide a theoretical basis for integrating creative industrial clusters.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 798-799)

Pages:

948-953

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ivan Turok. Cities. European Planning Studies, Vol. 11 (2003), No. 5, pp.549-565.

Google Scholar

[2] Michael E Porter. Harvard Business Review, (1998), pp.9-10.

Google Scholar

[3] Zheng ZiLi. Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Vol. 3(2012), pp.87-92. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] DONG Ke-chao WANG Juan. Shanxi Architecture, Vol. 38 (2012), No. 28, pp.1-4.

Google Scholar

[5] ZHAO Hong, WANG Jun-hong. Journal of Beijing Institute of Economic Management, Vol. 21 (2006), No. 28 pp.3-6. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] ZHAO Ying-fang. Oriental Forum, Vol. 3 (2009), pp.86-90. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] HUA Jian. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Vol. 9 ( 2007), No. 4, pp.3-31. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] ZHANG Wei XIE Yu-hong. Industrial Economic Review, Vol. 5 ( 2012), pp.62-72. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] HU Bin. China Industrial Economy, Vol. 5 (2007), pp.22-29. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Wu Yan, Chen Qiuling. Economic Tribune, Vol. 10 (2006), pp.9-49. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Chen Jianjun, Ge Baoqin. Contemporary Economy & Management, Vol. 9 ( 2008), pp.71-75. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Yu Weisheng. Game Theory and Economics Higher Education Press Publishing, Beijing, China, (2007), in press. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Mao Lei. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol. 27 (2010) , No. 8, pp.104-106. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Tian Zhonghe, Sun Quan. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, Vol. 3 ( 2012), pp.52-56. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Xie Zhiyu. Economic game theory Fudan University publishing house, Shanghai, China, (2001).

Google Scholar