Physioecologic and Metabolic Properties of a Ayntrophic Acetogenesis Coculture

Article Preview

Abstract:

In anaerobic digestion system, the functional niche of hydrogen-producing acetogens (HPAs) is between acidogenic fermentation bacteria and methanogens. HPAs are quite difficult to be isolated by pure and ampliative cultures due to the obligate anaerobic metabolism property in syntrophic association with methanogenic. In order to enhance the HPAs activities in anaerobic disgestion, the physioecologic and metabolic properties of HPAs under different medium conditions, such as carbon and nitrogen type, influent temperature and pH was investigated in batch cultivation experiments. The result illustrated that under the cultivation temperature of 45°C and pH of 8.0, the butyrate, propionate and benzoate could be utilized by the syntrophic acetogenesis coculture, of which the uptake rate of butyrate was highest. The glucose and sucrose were repulsed however. The metabolic activity of HPAs could be enormously simulated as the mixture of tryptone and yeast was taken as the nitrogen source.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 807-809)

Pages:

1290-1293

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Schink, B. Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. VOL. 61 (1997), p.262–280.

DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.61.2.262-280.1997

Google Scholar

[2] McInerney, M.J., and Bryant, M.P. Basic principles of anaerobic degradation and methane production. In Biomass Conversion Processes for Energy and Fuels. Sofer, S.S., and Zaborsky, O.R. (eds). New York, USA: Plenum Publishing Corp. (1981).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0301-6_15

Google Scholar

[3] Ishii, S., Kosaka, T., Hotta, Y. and Watanabe, K. (2006) Simulating the contribution of coaggregation to interspecies hydrogen fluxes in syntrophic methanogenic consortia. Appl Environ Microbiol. VOL. 72 (2006), p.5093–5096.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.00333-06

Google Scholar

[4] Sekiguchi, Y., Kamagata, Y., Nakamura, K., Ohashi, A., and Harada, H. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotides reveals localization of methanogens and selected uncultured bacteria in mesophilic and thermophilic sludge granules. Appl Environ Microbiol. VOL. 65. (1999).

DOI: 10.1128/aem.65.3.1280-1288.1999

Google Scholar

[5] McInerney, M.J., Struchtemeyer, C.G., Sieber, J., Mouttaki, H., Stams, A.J., Schink, B. Physiology, ecology, phylogeny, and genomics of microorganisms capable of syntrophic metabolism. Ann NY Acad Sci. VOL. 1125. (2008), p.58–72.

DOI: 10.1196/annals.1419.005

Google Scholar

[6] McHugh S, Carton M, Mahony T. Methanogenic population structure in a variety of anaerobic bioreactors. FEMS Microbiology Letters. VOL. 219 (2003), pp.297-304.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00055-7

Google Scholar

[7] Jackson, B. E., and M. J. McInerney. Anaerobic microbial metabolism can proceed close to thermodynamic limits. Nature. VOL. 415 (2002), p.454–456.

DOI: 10.1038/415454a

Google Scholar

[8] LI Jianzheng, SUN Qian, LIU Feng, GAO Chenchen. Selection and community structure analysis of two new syntrophic acetogen cocultures. Science and technology review. VOL. 27 (2008), pp.78-82.

Google Scholar