Change of Photosynthetic Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Cd-Sensitive Mutant Rice in Response to Cd Stress

Article Preview

Abstract:

The growth, photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence were investigated in wild type and mutant rice plants treated with 50 μmol L-1 Cd. The results showed that plant height, dry mass, and chlorophyll content decreased by Cd treatment, and the mutant showed more severe reduction than wild type rice. Net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (Gs), maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm), effective PSII quantum yield (ΦPS2), and photochemical quenching (qP) were decreased and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and and non-photochemical quenching (qN) were enhanced in Cd-treated plants with the increasing of Cd exposure time, with changes in the mutant being more evident. The results suggest that Cd inhibits photosynthesis due to non-stomatal limitations and the response of PSII reaction centre and the mutant has less capacity of acclimation to Cd stress.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 807-809)

Pages:

336-341

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.Y. He, Y.F. Ren, F.J. Wang, X.B. Pan, C. Zhu, D.A. Jiang: Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. Vol. 57 (2009), p.299.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Janik, W. Maksymiec, R. Mazur, M. Garstka, W.I. Gruszecki: Plant Cell Physiol. Vol. 71 (2010), p.1330.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Molas: Environ. Exp. Bot. Vol. 47 (2002), p.115.

Google Scholar

[4] E. Skórzyńska-Polit, and T. Baszyński: Plant Sci. Vol. 129 (1997), p.11.

Google Scholar

[5] C. Cobbett: New Phytol. Vol. 159 (2003), p.289.

Google Scholar

[6] T.I. Balakhnina, A.A. Kosobryukhov, A.A. Ivanov, V.D. Kreslavskii: Russ. J. Plant Physiol. Vol. 52 (2005), p.15.

Google Scholar

[7] B. Alaoui-Sossé, P. Genet, F. Vinit-Dunand, M.L. Toussaint, D. Epron, P.M. Badot: Plant Science Vol. 166 (2004), p.1213.

DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.12.032

Google Scholar

[8] E. Tůmovă and D. Sofrovă: Photosynthetica Vol. 40 (2002), p.103.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Wang, S.C. Zhoa, R.L. Liu, W. Zhou, J.Y. Jin: Photosynthetica Vol. 47 (2009), p.277.

Google Scholar

[10] C.C. Nwugo and A.J. Huerta: Plant Soil Vol. 311 (2008), p.73.

Google Scholar

[11] U. Najeeb, G. Jilani, S. Ali, M. Sarwar, L. Xu, W.J. Zhou: J. Hazard Mater. Vol. 186 (2011), p.565.

Google Scholar

[12] G. Shi, C. Liu, Q. Cai, Q. Liu, C. Hou: Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. Vol. 85 (2010), p.256.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Ekmekçi, D. Tanyolaç, B. Ayhan: J. Plant Physiol. Vol. 165 (2008), p.600.

Google Scholar

[14] G.L. Wan, U. Najeeb, G. Jilani, M.S. Naeem, W.J. Zhou: Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Vol. 18 (2011), p.1478.

Google Scholar

[15] P. Haldimann and U. Feller: Plant Cell Environ. Vol. 27 (2004), p.1169.

Google Scholar