The Carbon Sequestration of Pinus tabulaeformis Forests in Shanxi Province, China

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to estimate the carbon sequestration of Pinus tabulaeformis forests in Shanxi Province, field measurement data from 36 Pinus tabulaeformis forest stands and the 8th National Forest Resource Inventory data were collected. Using the field measurement data, the relationship between stand volume and stand biomass was established. By applying the relationship and a specific carbon concentration coefficient to the forest inventory data, the carbon sequestrations of nature and planted Pinus tabulaeformis forests in each age class were estimated respectively. The results show that the total carbon sequestration of Pinus tabulaeformis forests in Shanxi Province is 13.43 Tg (1 Tg=1012 g). The nature forests are acting as the major carbon sink, with the carbon sequestration accounting for 64% of the total amount. Among the forests in different age classes, the mid-aged and premature forests have sequestered around 10.92 Tg C, which accounts for 81% of the total carbon sequestration.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 807-809)

Pages:

810-813

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.M. Vitousek: Ecology Vol. 75 (1994), pp.1861-1876.

Google Scholar

[2] J.Y. Fang, A.P. Chen, C.H. Peng, S.Q. Zhao and L.J. Ci: Science Vol. 292 (2001), pp.2320-2322.

Google Scholar

[3] Z.Y. Wu: Vegetation of China (Science Press, Beijing, 1980) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] J.Y. Fang, G.H. Liu and S.L. Xu: Acta Ecol. Sin. Vol. 16 (1996), pp.497-508 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Zhao and G.S. Zhou: Forest Ecol. Manag. Vol. 207 (2005), pp.295-313.

Google Scholar

[6] Z.D. Guo, J.Y. Fang, Y.D. Pan and R. Birdsey: Forest Ecol. Manag. Vol. 259 (2010), pp.1225-1231.

Google Scholar

[7] Q.Y. Ma, X.L. Chen, J. Wang, C. Lin, F.F. Kang, W.Q. Cao, Z.B. Ma and W.Y. Li: Journal of Beijing Forestry University Vol. 24 (2002), pp.96-100 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Brown and A.E. Lugo: Interciencia Vol. 17 (1992), pp.8-18.

Google Scholar

[9] F. Li, Z.Y. Wang, H.Y. Zhang, Y.X. Xu and L. Han: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 726-731 (2013), pp.4237-4240.

Google Scholar

[10] R.A. Houghton, D.L. Skole, Carlos A. Nobre, J.L. Hackler, K.T. Lawrence and W.H. Chomentowski: Nature Vol. 403 (2000), pp.301-304.

DOI: 10.1038/35002062

Google Scholar

[11] Y.R. Zhou, Z.L. Yu and S.D. Zhao: Acta Phytoecologica Sinica Vol. 24 (2000), pp.518-522 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] J.M. Becknell, L.K. Kucek and J.S. Powers: Forest Ecol. Manag. Vol. 276 (2012), pp.88-95.

Google Scholar

[13] E. Marín-Spiotta, D. Cusack, R. Ostertag and W. Silver, in: Post-Agricultural Succession in the Neotropics, edited by R. Myster, chapter, 2, Springer (2008), pp.22-71.

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-33642-8_2

Google Scholar