Optimal Antenna Configurations for Digital Oilfield Implementations

Article Preview

Abstract:

Antennas play a very pivotal role in the development and advancement of digital oil fields. They provide the last mile communication link to the field locations and thus must be properly sized to ensure the link availability and reliability. There are different types of antennas currently being deployed with each having different impacts on the communication link performance. This paper discusses typical antenna configurations for implementing last mile communications to the field in digital oilfield applications. It analyzes the characteristic of each configuration, the impact these different configurations have on data security, deployment speed and communication range and presents an optimal configuration that improves data security, deployment speed and communication range.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

187-192

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Global Digital Oilfield Market by Services (Automation and Instrumentation, Information Technology) and Geography- Forcasts to 2022. www. researchand markets. com/reports. Feb (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] Al-Yateem K. S, Aminzadeh F and Dasgupta S.N. The implications of using state of the art technologies in Oilfields. Saudi Aramco Journal of Technology. Spring (2011).

Google Scholar

[3] Jansen J.D. Smart Wells Smart Well (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] Omair A. A Economic Evaluation of Smart well Technology. M. Sc Thesis Texas A&M University May (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Bieker H. P, Slupphaug. O and Johansen T.A. Real Time production optimization of Offshore Oil and Gas production Systems: A Technology Survey. SPE Intelligent Energy Conference Netherlands (2006).

DOI: 10.2118/99446-ms

Google Scholar

[6] Al-Ghamdi A.A. I-Field Role in Production Optimization. Production Optimization Middle East Conference (2009).

Google Scholar

[7] Idachaba F. E and Ogunrinde A. Review of Remote Terminal Units (RTUs) and Gateways for Digital Oilfield Implementation. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications IJACSA Vol 2 No 8 (2012).

DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2012.030826

Google Scholar

[8] Parikh, P.P., Kanabar, M.G. & Sidhu, T.S., 2010. Opportunities and challenges of wireless communication technologies for smart grid applications. Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2010 IEEE, pp.1-7.

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2010.5589988

Google Scholar

[9] Patan.A. K, Lee. H and Hong C.S. Security in Wireless Sensor networks: Issues and Challenges. ICACT (2006).

Google Scholar

[10] Saleh, M. and Khatib, I. A., Throughput Analysis of WEP Security in Ad Hoc Sensor Networks", Proc. The Second International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT, 05), September 26-28, Dubai, (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] Jones . K, Wadaa. A, Olariu. S, Wilson. L, Etoweissy .M. Towards a New Paradigm for Securing Wireless Sensor Networks. New Security Paradigm Workshop Switzerland ACM (2004).

DOI: 10.1145/986655.986672

Google Scholar

[12] Struzak.R. Basic Antenna Theory ICTP-ITU-URSI School on Wireless Networking for Development . The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics ICTP, Trieste (Italy), 5 to 24 February (2007).

DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2018013

Google Scholar