Effect of Bioleaching Microorganisms and Solid Ore Particles on Formation of Interfacial Crud in Solvent Extraction Plants

Article Preview

Abstract:

Effect of microorganisms and nickel sulfide ore before and after bioleaching on the emulsification was investigated. The emulsion stability was evaluated by the disengagement time or the production rate of crud. The results indicate that no crud formed and the disengagement time of system was prolonged with increasing bacteria density. And a large number of bacteria dispersed at the water-oil interface and aqueous phase and rarely existed in organic phase. The influence of bacteria on the emulsion stability was attributed to the structural characteristics and the mass transfer viscosity. And the emulsion with nickel sulfide ore after bioleaching was more stable, characterized as higher production rate of crud and lower light transmittance of aqueous phase, because bacteria alter the surface properties of minerals and increase particles’ hydrophilicity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

335-339

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Jaaskelainen, E. Paatero and B. Nyman: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 49(1998), pp.151-160.

Google Scholar

[2] V.B. Menon and D.T. Wasan: Separation Science and Technology Vol. 23(1988), pp.2131-2142.

Google Scholar

[3] H.W. Yarranton, H. Hussein and J.H. Masliyah: J. Colloid Interface Sci. Vol. 228(2000), pp.52-63.

Google Scholar

[4] C.J. Taylor, L.E. Dieker, K.T. Miller, C.A. Koh and E.D. Jr Sloan: J. Colloid Interface Sci. Vol. 306(2007), pp.255-261.

Google Scholar

[5] J.D. McLean and P.K. Kilpatrick: J. Colloid Interface Sci. Vol. 196(1997), pp.23-34.

Google Scholar

[6] B.M. Wilén, B. Jin and P. Lant: Water Research Vol. 37(2003), pp.2127-2139.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Harneit, A. GÖksel, D. Kock, J.H. Klock, T. Gehrke and D.W. Sand: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 83(2006), pp.245-254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.03.044

Google Scholar