Investigation of the Effect of pH Operating Conditions on Bioleaching of Low-Grade Chalcopyrite in Column Reactors

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bioleaching of low-grade sulphide minerals is now an established process, with much interest in chalcopyrite. However few studies have been carried out on ores containing silicates gangue materials. Chalcopyrite has been reported to be refractory at ambient temperature. Several factors that influence bioleaching kinetics are well documented such as particle size, pH, temperature, galvanic interaction and microbial activity. The purpose of this research was to investigated the effect of pH as well as pre-leaching on bioleaching of silicate rich and low-grade chalcopyrite using mixed thermophilic cultures, with a view to maximize copper solubilization rate in a column reactor operated at 70°C. The column was packed with low-grade chalcopyrite of the size range -20+15 mm. Leaching was monitored at specific time intervals (3 days) by measuring the pH, the redox potential, the copper and iron concentration in the solution. The results of the investigation have shown that copper extracted was highest at pH 1.3 and at moderately low redox potential (410 – 430 mV) using Ag/AgCl electrode, and that pre-leaching contributed insignificantly to the leaching rate. At pH 2.5, the copper extraction was low due to the jarosite. Furthermore, the analysis XRD of leached residues has indicated that the main passivating products were gypsum, jarosite, hexahydrite, and silica. However, although low pH resulted to high copper recovery, the results also showed that the pregnant leach solution (PLS) contained high concentrations of dissolved ions which might have inhibited the microbial activities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

401-405

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Watling, H. R., The bioleaching of sulphide minerals with emphasis on copper sulphides — A review. Hydrometallurgy 2006, 84, (1-2), 81-108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.05.001

Google Scholar

[2] Córdoba, E. M.; Muñoz, J. A.; Blázquez, M. L.; González, F.; Ballester, A., Leaching of chalcopyrite with ferric ion. Part I: General aspects. Hydrometallurgy 2008, 93, (3-4), 81-87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.04.015

Google Scholar

[3] Dutrizac, J. E.; MacDonald, R. J. C., Ferric iron as a leaching medium. Minerals. Science and Engineering 1974, 6, 59–100.

Google Scholar

[4] Muñoz, P. B.; Miller, J. D.; Wadsworth, M. E., Reaction mechanisms for the acid ferric sulfate leaching of chalcopyrite. Metallurgical Transactions B 1979, 10B, 149–158.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02652458

Google Scholar

[5] Kametani, H.; Aoki, A., Effect of suspension potential on the oxidation rate of copper concentrate in a sulfuric acid solution. . Metallurgical Transactions B 1985, 16B, 695–705.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02667506

Google Scholar

[6] Hiroyoshi, N.; Miki, H.; Hirajima, T.; Tsunekawa, M., Enhancement of chalcopyrite leaching by ferrous ions in acidic ferric sulfate solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2001, 60, (3), 185-197.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-386x(00)00155-9

Google Scholar

[7] Hiroyoshi, N.; Kuroiwa, S.; Miki, H.; Tsunekawa, M.; Hirajima, T., Effects of coexisting metal ions on the redox potential dependence of chalcopyrite leaching in sulfuric acid solutions. Hydrometallurgy 2007, 87, (1-2), 1-10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.07.006

Google Scholar

[8] Leahy, M. J.; Schwarz, M. P., Modelling jarosite precipitation in isothermal chalcopyrite bioleaching columns. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 98, (1-2), 181-191.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.04.017

Google Scholar

[9] Kinnunen, P. H. M.; Puhakka, J. A., High-rate iron oxidation at below pH 1 and at elevated iron and copper concentrations by a Leptospirillum ferriphilum dominated biofilm. Process Biochemistry 2005, 40, (11), 3536-3541.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.050

Google Scholar

[10] Plumb, J. J.; Muddle, R.; Franzmann, P. D., Effect of pH on rates of iron and sulfur oxidation by bioleaching organisms. Minerals Engineering 2008, 21, 76-82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2007.08.018

Google Scholar

[11] Mousavi, S. M.; Yaghmaei, S.; Vossoughi, M.; Roostaazad, R.; Jafari, A.; Ebrahimi, M.; Habibollahnia Chabok, O.; Turunen, I., The effects of Fe(II) and Fe(III) concentration and initial pH on microbial leaching of low-grade sphalerite ore in a column reactor. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99, 2840-2845.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.009

Google Scholar

[12] Halinen, A. -K.; Rahunen, N.; Kaksonen, A. H.; Puhakka, J. A., Heap bioleaching of a complex sulfide ore: Part I: Effect of pH on metal extraction and microbial composition in pH controlled columns. Hydrometallurgy 2009a, 98, (1-2), 92-100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.04.005

Google Scholar

[13] Dopson, M.; Halinen, A. -K.; Rahunen, N.; Boström, D.; Sundkvist, J. -E.; Riekkola-Vanhanen, M.; Kaksonen, A. H.; Puhakka, J. A., Silicate mineral dissolution during heap bioleaching. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2008, 99, (4), 811-820.

DOI: 10.1002/bit.21628

Google Scholar

[14] Acero, P.; Cama, J.; Ayora, C.; Asta, M. P., Chalcopyrite dissolution rate law from pH 1 to 3. Geologica Acta 2009, 7, (3), 389-397.

Google Scholar

[15] Brierley, J. A.; Kuhn, M. C., Fluoride toxicity in a chalcocite bioleach heap process. Hydrometallurgy 2010, 104, 410–413.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.01.013

Google Scholar

[16] Sicupira, L.; Veloso, T.; Reis, F.; Leão, V., Assessing metal recovery from low-grade copper ores containing fluoride. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 109, (3-4), 202-210.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.07.003

Google Scholar

[17] Córdoba, E. M.; Muñoz, J. A.; Blázquez, M. L.; González, F.; Ballester, A., Passivation of chalcopyrite during its chemical leaching with ferric ion at 68°C. Minerals Engineering 2009, 22, (3), 229-235.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2008.07.004

Google Scholar

[18] Hackl, R. P.; Dreisinger, D. B.; Peters, E.; King, J. A., Passivation of chalcopyrite during oxidative leaching in sulfate media. Hydrometallurgy 1995, 39, (1-3), 25-48.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-386x(95)00023-a

Google Scholar

[19] Peacey, J.; Guo, J. X.; Robles, E., Copper Hydrometallurgy-current status, Preliminary Economics, Future direction and positioning versus smelting. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China 2004, 14, (3), 560 - 568.

Google Scholar