The Influence of Welding Parameters on Tensile Behavior of Friction Stir Welded Al 2024-T4 Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present study, the relationships between friction stir welding parameters and the tensile behavior of Al 2024-T4 joints was investigated. The aluminum alloy plates were butt-welded using a hardened steel tool with a threaded and fluted cylindrical pin at various tool rotation speed to advancing speed ratios. Metallographic observations, EDS analysis and microhardness measurements show that the band spacing in the periodic microstructure of the stir zone and the average microhardness of this region decrease with increasing speed ratio. Tensile ductility is strongly affected by welding parameters and final elongation increases significantly with speed ratio at the constant rotating speed of 900 rpm. This behavior is found to be associated with a change in tensile fracture location. Formation of microscopic voids at low speed ratios leads to premature fracture in the nugget zone, while in the defect-free joints produced at higher speed ratios the fracture location shifts into the HAZ on the retreating side, which exhibits the lowest microhardness value within the weld joint. At the optimum rotation speed of 900 rpm and speed ratio of 11.2 rev/mm the tensile strength and final elongation of the joints are equivalent to 97% and 77% that of base metal, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 83-86)

Pages:

1197-1204

Citation:

Online since:

December 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.S. Mishra: Mater. Sci. and Eng. R, Vol. 50 (2005), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] M.A. Sutton, B. Yang, A.P. Reynolds and R. Taylor: Mater. Sci. and Eng. A, Vol. 323 (2002), p.160.

Google Scholar

[3] A.P. Reynolds, B. Yang, J. Yan and M.A. Sutton: Mater. Sci. and Eng. A, Vol. 364 (2004), p.55.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. S. Sato, M. Urata and H. Kokawa: Metall. and Mater. Trans. A, Vol. 33A (2002), p.625.

Google Scholar

[5] M.A. Sutton, B. Yang, A.P. Reynolds and J. Yan: Mater. Sci. and Eng. A, Vol. 364 (2004), p.66.

Google Scholar

[6] D.P.P. Booth, M.J. Starink and I. Sinclair: Mater. Sci. and Tech., Vol. 23 (2007), p.276.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Genevois, A. Deschamps, A. Denquin and B. Doisneau-Cottignies, Acta Materialia, Vol. 53 (2005), p.2447.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Deschamps and W. J. Poole: Materials Science and Engineering A, Vol. 441 (2006), p.39.

Google Scholar

[9] M.J. Jones, P. Heurtier, C. Desrayaud, F. Montheillet, D. Allehaux and J.H. Driver: Scripta Materialia, Vol. 52 (2005), p.693.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.12.027

Google Scholar

[10] A.P. Reynolds, B. Yang and R. Taylor: Eng. Fract. Mech., Vol. 70 (2003), p.2215.

Google Scholar

[11] S.R. Ren, Z.Y. Ma and L.Q. Chen: Scripta Materialia, Vol. 56 (2007), p.69.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Lim, S. Kim, C. Lee and S. Kim: Metall. and Mater. Trans. A, Vol. 35A (2004), p.2837.

Google Scholar

[13] H.J. Liu, H. Fujii, M. Maeda and K. Nogi: Mater. Proces. Tech., Vol. 142 (2003) p.692.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Lim, S. Kim, C. Lee and S. Kim: Metall. and Mater. Trans. A, Vol. 35A (2004) p.2829.

Google Scholar