Structure Features of Martensite and Residual Austenite during Treatment with Concentrated Energy Fluxes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper deals with the structure features of Fe-C alloys quenched by means of laser, electron beam and plasma arc. The martensite and residual austenite obtained are highly inhomogeneous. Their morphology and distribution depend both on the initial state before quenching and on the kinetics of the temperature changes. Four different structures of martensite are observed – package, lamellar isothermal, lamellar thermo-kinetic and “feathery nest-like”. The new martensite structure observed, called by us “feathery nest-like”, is a result of explosive austenite-martensite transformation in pearlitic irons. It differs from the classic modification in its specific morphology. Low-carbon package martensite occupies the regions of the former ferrite grains. Its hardness reaches 1050-1150 HV0.1. In the regions of microstructure with increased carbon concentration lamellar martensite is observed. The residual austenite is with different proportion in relation to the martensite. In particular regions its quantity could reach 100%. It is characterized by a high quantity of imperfections and high mechanical properties. Its hardness reaches 450-500 HV0.1. The higher the power density and the lower the energy density of the concentrated energy flux, the higher the residual austenite quantity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 83-86)

Pages:

889-895

Citation:

Online since:

December 2009

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Pantsar, J Laser Application, July 2000, pp.41-44.

Google Scholar

[2] I.G. Kozir, V. Yu. Babkin, Fizika i himia obrabotki materialov, 2000, ʋ6, pp.81-86.

Google Scholar

[3] T.L. Chen et al., J Mater Process Technol, 63(1997), pp.546-549.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Stavrev et al., Proceedings of the 5th International Congress Heat Treatment of Materials, Kyoto, Japan, November 17-20, 1992, pp.413-416.

Google Scholar

[5] M.F. Ashby and U.E. Edsterling, Acta metall, vol. 32, 1984, ʋ11, p.1935-(1948).

Google Scholar

[6] V.S. Kraposhin, K.V. Shahlevich, T.M. Vyazmina, MiTOM, 1989, ʋ10, pp.21-27.

Google Scholar

[7] I.L. Pobol, MiTOM, 1990, ʋ7, pp.42-46.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Stavrev et al., MiTOM, 1996, ʋ9, pp.16-19.

Google Scholar