Seismic Response Characteristics of Subway Station Structure

Article Preview

Abstract:

The dynamic Davidenkov model is used to model dynamic characteristics of soils, and plastic-damage model is used to model dynamic characteristics of station structure concrete. So that, considering the influence of soil-station structure interaction for 2D finite element analysis, the dynamic interaction of soil-station structure is modeled. The damage characteristics and energy response of station structure under seismic motion is analyzed. The result shows that damping energy and hysteretic energy are monotone increasing under ground motion, and the seismic characteristic has significant effect on the energy response of subway station structure. Furthermore, concentration effect of hysteretic energy of subway station structure is measured by hysteretic energy density. It is found that the hysteretic energy is the most centralized in the column, so the dynamic response of the columns is the maximum. Furthermore, the nonlinear damage evolution law of station structure is analyzed. The law of local and global damage index is consistent essentially, and the damage index is increased by the effect of accumulative deformation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 838-841)

Pages:

1613-1619

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Liu J B, Li B, Gu Y. seismic response analysis of shielded subway tunnels[J]. Tsinghua University Science and Technology). 2005, 45(6): 757-760.

Google Scholar

[2] Jiang X L, Song L M. Seismic Response Analysis of Underground Tunnel in Soft Soil[J]. Earthquake engineering and engineering vibration. 1999, 19(1): 65-69.

Google Scholar

[3] CHEN Guo-xing, ZHUANG Hai-yang, DU Xiu-li, et al. Analysis of large-scale shaking table test of dynamic soil-subway station interaction[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 27(2): 171-176.

Google Scholar

[4] Zuo X, Yang S C, Chen G X. Analysis on Evolution of Nonlinear Seismic Damage of Subway Station Structure[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2010, 32(1): 110-116.

Google Scholar

[5] Chen G X, Zuo X, Zhuang H Y. A comparison between large-size shaking table test results and numerical simulation of a subway station structure[J]. Earthquake engineering and engineering vibration. 2008, 28(1): 157-164.

Google Scholar

[6] Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8): 892-900.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)

Google Scholar

[7] Chen G X, Zhuang H Y. Developed nonlinear dynamic constitutive relations of soils based on Davidenkov skeleton curve[J]. Chinese Jounal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(8): 860-864.

Google Scholar

[8] Wang D R. Study on engineering analytical model and numerical simulation on hypervelocity penetration[D]. Hefei: University of science and technology of China., (2002).

Google Scholar