Experimental Study on Concrete Columns with Various Sizes Confined by BFRP and Hybrid FRP under Axial Compression

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fourteen concrete columns with various sizes confined by BFRP and hybrid FRP and six plain concrete columns as the control specimens were axially loaded to failure in order to investigate both confining effects and size effects in concrete columns confined by BFRP and hybrid FRP. Experimental results show that BFRP and hybrid FRP can increase considerably both the capacity and ductility of the concrete specimens. Furthermore, the peak stress of the unconfined concrete decreases with the size of the specimens increasing. Similarly, the peak stress of BFRP confined concrete decreases with the size of the specimens increasing when the lateral confining stresses are the same. Hence, both confining effect and size effects should be considered carefully in the stress-strain model of concrete confined by BFRP. In addition, both strength and ductility of concrete confined by hybrid FRP in case of CFRP as inner layers and BFRP as outward layers are better than those in case of BFRP as inner layers and CFRP as outward layers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 838-841)

Pages:

407-411

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Nanni A. and Bradford N. M: Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 9 (2) (1995), pp.115-124.

Google Scholar

[2] Nanni A. and Norris M. S: Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 9 (2) (1995), pp.273-281.

Google Scholar

[3] Lam L. and Teng J. G: J Struct. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 128(5) (2002), pp.612-623.

Google Scholar

[4] Xiao Y. and Wu H: J. Mater. Civ. Eng., Vol. 12(2) (2000), pp.139-146.

Google Scholar

[5] Purba B.K. and Mufti A. A: Can. J. Civ. Eng., Vol. 26 (1999), pp.590-596.

Google Scholar

[6] Lam L. and Teng J. G: Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 17 (6) (2003), pp.471-489.

Google Scholar

[7] Jiang T. and Teng J. G: Engineering Structures, Vol. 29 (11) (2007), pp.2968-2986.

Google Scholar

[8] Theriault M, Neale KW. and Claude S: J. Compos. Constr., Vol. 8 (2004), pp.313-323.

Google Scholar

[9] Masia MJ, Gale TN and Shrive NG: Can. J. Civ. Eng., Vol. 31 (2004), pp.1-13.

Google Scholar

[10] Elsanadedy HM, AL-Salloum YA, Alsayed SH and Iqbal RA: Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 29 (2012), pp.56-72.

Google Scholar

[11] Yeboah D, Taylor S, Mcpolin D and Gilfillan R: Constr. Build. Mater., Vol. 38 (2013), pp.962-969.

Google Scholar

[12] Wang X and Wu Z: Composite Structures, Vol. 92 (2010), pp.2582-2590.

Google Scholar

[13] Zhou D, Lei Z and Wang J: Composite Structures, Vol. 102 (2013), pp.9-19.

Google Scholar