Study of the Bearing Capacity of Closely Spaced-Small Edge Distance Chemical Anchors Group System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Anchors group system, whose spacing and edge distance could not meet the requirements of the code, were tested. Based on the test, the finite element models involving geometric and materials nonlinearity were presented. The finite element analysis (FEA) were proved to be reasonable by comparing the results of FEA to the results of test. Anchors systems of spacing and edge distance from 2d to 9d,under tension load were simulated. It turned out that, the maximum bearing capacity of anchors group system was achieved when the spacing and edge distance were 8d, which was 40% bigger than the one of 5d. The minimum bearing capacity of anchors system was obtained when the spacing and edge distance were 3d, for the destroyed areas of concrete of adjacent anchors overlaped. Anchors group system of spacing and edge distance smaller than 5d still could be used through reducing the ultimate bearing capacity by a factor γsc. The formula ofγsc was obtained through numerical analysis method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 838-841)

Pages:

611-617

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Pan Yongqiang: Analysis of Anchor Group Behavior of Concrete. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University(2007), in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[2] Bai Yongliang, Yang Jinyon and Song Hailong: The Construction Technology of Chemical Anchor in Building Reinforcement. Building Structure Vol. 40 No. S2 (2010) P. 657-660, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[3] JGJ145-2004 Technical specification post – installed fastenings in concrete structures. (China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing 2004), in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[4] Meng Dafei. Analysis of the chemical planting steel bar bearing capacity influencing factors. Sanxi Architecture Vol. 36 No. 2 (2010) P. 82-84, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[5] Xiong Xueyu, Xu Lixin and Hu Jiazhi. Pull-out experiment study of chemical bonded rebar. Architecture technology Vol. 31 No. 6 (2000) P. 383-384, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[6] Xing Guoqi, Wang Xiaoli. Pull- out experimental study on new type of chemical anchoring bolts. Industrial Construction, Vol. 41 No. 2 (2011) P. 66-69, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[7] He Yong, Xu Yuanjie and Lin Tao. Experimental study on performance double adhesive anchors for strengthening concrete structure. Journal of Wuhan University of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering Vol. 31 No. 6 (2000) P. 88-91, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Wan Zhan sheng, Xia Yongxu and Han Ruichang. Experimental research on mechanic behavior under high temperature of chemistry anchor bolts. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science) Vol. 30 No. 1 (2010) P. 63-66, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Xing Guoqi. Ultimate uplift capacity experiment study of new type chemical anchoring bolts under high temperature. Concrete Vol. 8 No. 24 (2010) P. 71-79, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Su Lei, Li Ji and Lu Zhoudao. Chemical anchor bolt anchorage group subjected to shearing strength. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology Vol. 42 No. 4 (2010) P. 612-616, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[11] Su Lei, Li Ji and Lu Zhoudao. Analysis of Shearing Load-Carrying Capacity of Post-Installed Fastenings Anchor Group System in Concrete Structures. Structural Engineers Vol. 25 No. 5 (2009) P. 40-44, in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[12] MeVay, Ronald A Cook, Kailash Krishnamurthy. Pullout Simulation of Postinstalled Chemically Bonded Anchors. Joumal of Structural Engineering Vol. 9 (1996) P 1016-1024.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:9(1016)

Google Scholar

[13] Mansour Shirvani, Richard E. Klingner, and Herman L. Graves. Break out Capacity of Anchors in concrete-Part1: Tension. ACI Structural Journal (2004) P. 812-820.

Google Scholar

[14] KDZavliaris, SKollias, and P S S SPeare. An Experimental Study of Adhesively Bonded Anchorages in Concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research Vol. 48 No. 6 (1996) P 79-93.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.1996.48.175.79

Google Scholar

[15] Dieter Lotze, Richard E Klingner. Static Behavior of Anchors under Combinations of Tension and Shear Loading. ACI Structural Journal (2001) P. 525-536.

DOI: 10.14359/10295

Google Scholar

[16] Tamon Ueda, Boonchai Stitmannaithum. Experimental Investigation on Shear Strength of Bolt Anchorage Group. ACI Structural Journal (1991) P. 292-300.

DOI: 10.14359/2692

Google Scholar

[17] Sherief S.S. Sakla, Ashraf F. Ashour. Prediction of tensile capacity of single adhesive anchors using neural networks. Computers and Structures Vol. 8 No. 2 (2005) P 1792–1803.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.008

Google Scholar

[18] Antonino Spada, Giuseppe Giambanco and Piervincenzo Rizzo. Elastic plastic Damaging Model for Adhesive Anchor Systems. I: Theoretical Formulation and Numerical Implementation. Journal of engineering mechanics Vol. 137 No. 12 (2011) P 854-861.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000287

Google Scholar

[19] Gurbuz, Tuba, IIki and Alper. Pullout performance of fully and partially bonded retrofit anchors in low-strength concrete. ACI Structural Journal (2011) P 61-70.

DOI: 10.14359/51664203

Google Scholar

[20] HILTI Fastening Technological Manual (2010) P 45-52.

Google Scholar

[21] Wang Jinlong. ANSYS12. 0 Civil Engineering Applications. (China Machine Press, Beijing 2011), in Chinese.

Google Scholar

[22] Xing Guoqi. Experimental Study of Distribution Rule of Bond Force on New Chemical Anchor Bolt Anchor aged in concrete. Concrete Vol. 4 No. 2 (2011) P 9-16, in Chinese.

Google Scholar