Technology Management: Developing an Innovation Model for Research Universities in Malaysia

Article Preview

Abstract:

Institutions of Higher Learning in Malaysia had been viewed as the source for new innovation. Hence, few universities in Malaysia had been upgraded to the status of Research University to reinforce the nations New Economic Model via research, development and commercialization of new innovation. As such, Technology Driven innovation model that traditionally used by academic in Institutions of Higher Learning is now insufficient to support the innovation work within the scope and definition of Research University, this is due to it is lack of focus on commercialization element. Therefore, this paper aims to propose an innovation model devotes to Research Universities in Malaysia. In line with this, the paper reviews the important elements of innovation, followed by comparison of elements in corporate and academic innovation models. Finding from this paper suggested that building-up innovation competency in Research University requires an innovation model that integrates all innovation elements from holistic business points of view. The paper proposed an integrated innovation model based on Total Innovation Management paradigm. The proposed model has descriptive value in terms of studying, classifying and defining the important elements and relationships that govern innovation process and management aspects in Research universities within Malaysia.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

549-553

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Antonio, A. Jose, Innovation Management Techniques and Tools: A Review from Theory and Practice. Journal of R&D Management, 38 (2008) 113-127.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Trott, Innovation Management and New Product Development, third edition. Prentice Hall, England, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] V. Chiesa, R&D strategy and organziation: Managing technical change in dynamic contexts, Imperial College Press, London, (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Rasli, R. Arshad, N. Talib, S. Ramli, A.A. Senin, Introduction to Management of Technology, Skudai, Johor, (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Nieto, From R&D management to knowledge management: An overview of studies of innovation management, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 70 (2003) 135-161.

DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1625(02)00196-8

Google Scholar

[6] G.V. Panne, C.V. Beers, A. Kleinknecht, Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7 (2003) 309-338.

DOI: 10.1142/s1363919603000830

Google Scholar

[7] T.H. Byers, R.C. Dorf, A.J. Nelson, Technology Ventures From Idea to Enterprise, first edition McGraw-Hill, New York, (2011).

Google Scholar

[8] S. Marisa, B. Marco, B. Peter, V.D.M. Robert, Factors Influencing an Organization's Ability to Manage Innovation: A Structured Literature Review and Conceptual Model, International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(2008) 655–676.

DOI: 10.1142/s1363919608002138

Google Scholar

[9] M.G. Jacobides, The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war, Organization Science, 18(2007) 455-477.

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0278

Google Scholar

[10] A. Hartmann, The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative behaviour in construction firms. Construction Innovation, 6(2006) 159-172.

DOI: 10.1108/14714170610710712

Google Scholar

[11] R.G. Cooper, E.J. Kleinschmidt, Winning Businesses in Product Development: The Crtitical Success Factors. Research Technology Management, 2007 52-66.

DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2007.11657441

Google Scholar

[12] G.M. Scott, Critical Technology Management Issues of New Product Development in High-Tech Companies. Journal of Production and Innovation Management, 17 (2000) 57-77.

DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1710057

Google Scholar

[13] L.G. Bardely, E.B. Mary, J.S. Larry Comparing Academic and Corporate Technology Development Process. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 25(2008) 47-62.

Google Scholar

[14] Q. Xu, J. Chen, L. Chen, L. Jin, D. Lou, Total Innovation Management competence and innovation performance in SMEs – An Empeirical Study Based on SME Survey in Zhejian Province. ISMOT&ICMIT' 02 Proceding 2002 261-265.

DOI: 10.1109/ieem.2008.4738010

Google Scholar

[15] T. Astebro, The Return to Independent Invention: Evidence of Unrealistic Optimism, Risk Seeking or Skewness Loving, The Economic Journal. 113(2003), 226–239.

DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00089

Google Scholar