A Conceptual Model of Work Productivity Associated with Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in the Industrial Repetitive Task

Article Preview

Abstract:

The performance of workers is a very important factor that could affect the overall productivity result. In the industrial repetitive task, the performance of direct workers has a significant impact on the work productivity. In this kind of task, the work productivity loss is not only seen from time loss but also due to functional incapacity of the workers. The workers are present at work but functionally limited due to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). There are various studies which have reported on the effects of WMSDs on the work productivity, but few attempts have been made to investigate the relationship. This study aims to develop a conceptual model of work productivity associated with WMSDs as an aid to identify the relationship between the risks of WMSDs and the work productivity. The knowledge on the relationship is important to reduce the risk of WMSDs and at the same time can optimize the work productivity. A conceptual model of work productivity associated with WMSDs in the industrial repetitive task was developed based on the review on the existing models and theories. The factors involved in the model were discussed. The factors involved were work-related physical risk factors, muscle fatigue, work-related musculoskeletal disorders and work productivity.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

623-626

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Escorpizo, Understanding work productivity and its application to work-related musculoskeletal disorders, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 38, no. 3–4, p.291–297, Mar. (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.10.018

Google Scholar

[2] Medibank, Sick at Work, p. <http: /wwww. medibank. com. au>Acessed Jun 2012, (2011).

Google Scholar

[3] MPC, Malaysian Productivity Corporation (MPC ) Productivity Report, (2011).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Finneran and L. O'Sullivan, Force, posture and repetition induced discomfort as a mediator in self-paced cycle time, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 40, no. 3, p.257–266, May (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.01.004

Google Scholar

[5] W. B. Brouwer, M. A Koopmanschap, and F. F. Rutten, Productivity losses without absence: measurement validation and empirical evidence., Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), vol. 48, no. 1, p.13–27, Jul. (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00028-7

Google Scholar

[6] Z. Xu, J. Ko, D. J. Cochran, and M. Jung, Design of assembly lines with the concurrent consideration of productivity and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders using linear models, Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 62, no. 2, p.431–441, Mar. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.10.008

Google Scholar

[7] Ontario Ministry of Labour, Prevent Workplace Pains & Strains! It's time to take action!, <http: /www. labour. gov. on. ca/english/hs/pubs/ergonomics/is_ergonomics. php> Assessed May, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Lotters, F., Meerding, W.J., Burdof, Reduced productivity after sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders and its relation to health outcome, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, vol. 31, p.367–374, (2005).

DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.920

Google Scholar

[9] M. Hagberg, E. W. Tornqvist, and A. Toomingas, Self-reported reduced productivity due to musculoskeletal symptoms: associations with workplace and individual factors among white-collar computer users., Journal of occupational rehabilitation, vol. 12, no. 3, p.151–62, Sep. (2002).

DOI: 10.1080/00140130701674539

Google Scholar

[10] D. E. Beaton and C. A. Kennedy, Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain., Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, vol. 14, no. 8, p.1869–79, Oct. (2005).

DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-3865-9

Google Scholar

[11] W. G. Pransky, G., Benjamin, K., Hill-Fotoubi, C., Himmelstein, J., Fletcher, K.E., Katz, J.N., Johnson, Work related outcomes in occupational low back pain : a multidimensional analysis, Spine, vol. 27, no. 8, p.864–870, (2002).

DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00017

Google Scholar

[12] J. Westgaard, R. H and Winkel, Guidelines for Occupational Musculoskeletal Load as a Basis for Intervention : A Critical Review, Applied ergonomics, vol. 27, no. 2, p.79–88, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00062-3

Google Scholar

[13] B. Rolander, Work conditions , musculoskeletal disorders and productivity of dentists in public dental care in Sweden, Dissertation, Linkoping University Medical Dissert, (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] M. P. O'Donnell, Health and Productivity Management : The Concept, Impact and Opportunity, Am J Health Promot., vol. 14, p.215–217, (2000).

Google Scholar

[15] M. Helander, A Guide to Human Factors and Ergonomics, Second. Taylor & Francis, (2006).

Google Scholar

[16] V. Putz-Anderson, Cumulative trauma disorders : A manual for musculoskeletal diseases of the upper limbs., London and New York, Taylor & Francis, (1988).

Google Scholar

[17] L. Ma, F. Bennis, and D. Chablat, Framework for Dynamic Evaluation of Muscle Fatigue in Manual Handling Work, System, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/icit.2008.4608546

Google Scholar

[18] M. A. Nussbaum, Fatigue and endurance limits during intermittent overhead work, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, vol. 62, p.446–456, (2001).

DOI: 10.1080/15298660108984646

Google Scholar

[19] L. Ma, D. Chablat, and W. Zhang, Dynamic Muscle Fatigue Evaluation in Virtual Working Environment, Ergonomics, vol. 1, no. January, p.211–220, (2009).

Google Scholar