Experiment Investigation of Hole Accuracy and Surface Roughness in Femur Bone Drilling Using Different Parameters

Abstract:

Success indicators in bone drilling include clean, good accuracy drilled holes without damage at the surrounding tissue. This study investigates the influence of cutting parameters in bone drilling against hole accuracy (enlargement diameter, circularity error, and cylindricity error) and surface roughness (Ra). A series of bone drilling experiments was carried out using femur bovine bone and without irrigation. Variations of drill type (high speed steel and coated and uncoated carbide) and cutting speed (19 m/min and 94 m/min) were used as input variables, while the feed rate (0.025 mm/rev) was constant. It was found that coated carbide drill results minimum magnitude on all machining responses. Type of tool gives significant effect on diameter enlargement and surface roughness, yet not on circularity and cylindricity errors. The range of cutting speed evaluated does not give significant effect on any surface integrity measures.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 845)
• Pages: 720-723
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.845.720
• Online since: December 2013
• Authors: P.Y.M. Wibowo Ndaruhadi, S. Sharif, Denni Kurniawan*
• Keywords: Bone Drilling, Cutting Parameter, Hole Accuracy, Surface Roughness (SR)

References

[1] M.T. Hillery and I Shuaib, Temperature effects in the drilling of human and bovine bone, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 92-93 (1999) 302-308.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00155-7

[2] C Natali, P Ingle, J Dowell, Orthopaedic bone drills – can they be improved? Temperature changes near the drilling face, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 78 (1996), pp.357-62.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.78b3.0780357

[3] Goran Augustin, Tomislav Zigman, Slavko Davila, T Udilljak, Tomislav Staroveski, Danko Brezak, Slaven Babic, Review: Cortical bone drilling and thermal osteonecrosis, Clinical Biomechanics 27 (2012) 313–325.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.10.010

[4] JuEun Lee, B. Arda Gozen, O. Burak Ozdoganlar, Modeling and experimentation of bone drilling forces, Journal of Biomechanics 45 (2012) 1076–1083.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.012

[5] S.R.H. Davidson, DF James, Drilling in bone: modeling heat generation and temperature distribution, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 125 (2003), pp.305-314.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1535190

[6] D Kurniawan, N Jiawkok, MY Noordin, Machining conditions effect to machining temperature and forces in orthogonal machining of bone, Advanced Materials Research. 658 (2013), pp.223-226.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.658.223

[7] M.R. Bruce, D.B. Burr, N.A. Sharkey. Skeletal Tissue Mechanics. New York, Springer. (1998).

[8] M.Y. Noordin, D. Kurniawan, Y.C. Tang, K. Muniswaran, Feasibility of mild hard turning of stainless steel using coated carbide tool. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 60 (2012), pp.853-863.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3656-0

[9] Chang Kuan Yu, Chang Hong Chang, Yu Pu Ping, Yen Ke Tien, and Huang Bo Wun, Natural Properties in a Micro Drill Cutting into Bones, Life Science Journal, Vol 6 (2009), pp.28-33.

[10] Ula¸s Çayda¸s, Ahmet Hasçalık, Ömer Buytoz, and Ahmet Meyveci, Performance Evaluation of Different Twist Drills in Dry Drilling of AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 26 (2011), p.951–960.

DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2010.520790

[11] N. Bertollo, T.K. Gothelf, W.R. Walsh, 3-Fluted orthopaedic drills exhibit superior bending stiffness to their 2-fluted rivals: Clinical implications for targeting ability and the incidence of drill-bit failure, Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 39 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.286

[12] S. Sharif, E.A. Rahim, Performance of coated and uncoated carbide tools when drilling of titanium alloy – Ti-6Al4V. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 185 (2007) pp.72-76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.142