The Influence of Rock Pyrolysis Parameters Correction on the Hydrocarbon Expulsion Efficiency — Taking Example of Well Xu11

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the rock pyrolysis experiment, part of the boiling point above 300°C of the high carbon number hydrocarbons and the hydrocarbon generated from pyrolysis of resin and asphaltene detected into S2, resulting in the thermolysis residual hydrocarbon "S1" is smaller than the real value, potential hydrocarbon generation of kerogen "S2" is greater than the real value. Thus using the experimental pyrolysis parameters directly calculate the hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency is greater than the real value. We used the pyrolysis parameters before and after correction, combined with the method of the restoring of original hydrocarbon potential to calculate the hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency of mudstone of Qingshankou l member of well Xu 11 in San Zhao area of Song Liao Basin. The average of the expulsion efficiency before and after the pyrolysis parameters correction are 87.4% and 66.9%. The hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency have a great difference between before and after correction, thus the pyrolysis parameters correction is particularly important in the calculation of hydrocarbon expulsion efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

60-65

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Houqin Z, Pinglan L, Xiongqi P, et al. China Petroleum Exploration , 2008, 3: 5-9.

Google Scholar

[2] Liyan W. Rapid quantitative evaluation of oil source rock pyrolysis. Science Press, Beijing, China, 1986: 23-31.

Google Scholar

[3] Qin Z, Hongyan W, Wenhua B, et al. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2013, 20(2): 154-156.

Google Scholar

[4] Dixiao G, Tilin H, et al. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1984, 6: 10-17.

Google Scholar

[5] Kaiqi L, Guoying Y, et al. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1985, 6: 31-37.

Google Scholar

[6] Anqiao W, Baoming Z. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 1987, 9(4): 342-350.

Google Scholar

[7] Andrew S. Pepper. In: England W, Fleet AJ (eds) Petroleum migration. Geological Society, London, 1991, 59: 9-31.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Leythaeuser, et al. The American Association of petroleum geologist bulletin. 1984, 68(2): 196-219.

Google Scholar

[9] Yichuan, T, Shizhi F. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1989, 14(3): 259-269.

Google Scholar

[10] Qinlin D, Xinhua L, Jiamo F. Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science), 1996, 24 Sup: 83-87.

Google Scholar

[11] Zhongzhen M, Xiongqi P, Junke S, et al. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2009, 31(1): 14-18.

Google Scholar

[12] Jijun L, Hui W, Shuangfang L, et al. Journal of Jilin University Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42 Sup. 1: 26-42.

Google Scholar

[13] G.P. Cooles, A.S. Mackenzie and T.M. Organic Geochemistry, 1986, 10: 235-345.

Google Scholar

[14] Zhonghong C. Journal of Xian Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2007, 22(6): 40-49.

Google Scholar

[15] Xiaoyu Z, Wei L. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 1993, 15(2): 23-26.

Google Scholar