Analysis and Quantification of Grain Size of Various DHP Copper Tubes Manufacturing Processes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Deoxidized High Phosphorus (DHP) Copper tubes are frequently used in numerous industrial and household applications. To ensure the acceptability of DHP copper tubes prepared by various industrial processes, the quality of the DHP copper tubes must be evaluated and one of the best ways to do so is to examine the microstructure and metallography and quantify grain size. In this paper the authors considered the average grain size of copper tube samples made traditionally as well as by the planetary rolling and CastTube process. Because of the small thickness of the CastTube samples, in certain circumstances traditional methods of grain counting were not plausible and a new procedure for grain counting needed developed. This paper is about the development and evaluation of grain sizes in continuously cast tube samples using both the planimetric procedure (ASTM E112) and a new method, which will be herby, referred to as the total grain counting method. This paper also concludes that there is a large difference in the grain size of tubes with different manufacturing methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

241-245

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Xintao, Guo Zhaoxiang, Continuous casting of copper tube billets under rotating electromagnetic field, Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, A Vol. 460–461 (2007), P. 648–651.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.078

Google Scholar

[2] M.B. Karamı¸ A. Ta¸sdemirci, F. Nair, Microstructural analysis and discontinuities in the brazed zone of copper tubes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, VOL. 141 (2003), P. 302–312.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00281-4

Google Scholar

[3] ASTM, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Product, A 370 – 07b.

Google Scholar

[4] EN ISO, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Metallic materials – Tube - Drift-expanding test, 8493: (1998).

DOI: 10.3403/03157256

Google Scholar

[5] EN ISO, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Metallic materials –Tube - Flattening test, 8492: (1998).

Google Scholar

[6] A. Rukwied, A.W. Ruff, W.A. Willard, Study of the cellular solidification structure in a continuously cast high purity copper, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, August 1971, Volume 2, Issue 8, P. 2105-2114.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02917538

Google Scholar

[7] Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis, Application and Innovation for Metals, Alloys, and Engineered Materials, ISSN: 2192-9270 (electronic version) Journal No. 13632.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Petzow, H. Knosp, application of microreflection in metallography, Metallography, Volume 6, Issue 3, June 1973, P. 249-260.

DOI: 10.1016/0026-0800(73)90024-4

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM, Standard Test Methods for Determining Average Grain Size, E 112-10.

Google Scholar

[10] Jefferies Z, Kline AH, Zimmer EB. The determination of grain size in metals. Trans AIME 1916; 57: 594–607.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Engqvist, B. Uhrenius, Determination of the average grain size of cemented carbides, International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials Vol. 21 (2003) P. 31–35.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-4368(03)00005-2

Google Scholar