Pitch Perception of Medium-Rank Harmonic Complex Tones Based on Temporal Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fundamental frequency difference limens were measured for a target harmonic complex tone (HCT) in the absence and presence of a masker HCT, which were filtered into the same bandpass frequency region and were gated on and off synchronously. There were three kinds of nominal fundamental frequencies (F0s) for target (200, 400, and 800 Hz), five kinds of F0 separations between target and masker (0, ±3, and ±6 semitones), and four kinds of phase combinations. Results found significant effects of nominal F0, phase combination, and F0 separation between target and masker. Analysis based on temporal profile proved that the significant effect of nominal F0 could be explained by peak height of target, and that the significant effects of F0 separation and phase combination could be explained by the ratio of temporal peak heights between target and masker. Thus it is suggested that F0 discrimination of medium-rank harmonics probably depends on the use of temporal fine structure information.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 860-863)

Pages:

2924-2928

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B.C.J. Moore, B.R. Glasberg, H.J. Flanagan, et al. Frequency discrimination of complex tones; assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006, 119: 480-490.

DOI: 10.1121/1.2139070

Google Scholar

[2] A.J. Oxenham, C. Micheyl, M.V. Keebler. Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics? J Acoust Soc Am, 2009, 125: 2189-2199.

DOI: 10.1121/1.3089220

Google Scholar

[3] S. Bleeck, D.T. Ives, R.D. Patterson. AIM-MAT: The auditory image model in MATLAB. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2004, 90: 781-788.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 1971, 49: 467-477.

Google Scholar

[5] B.C.J. Moore, M. Huss, D.A. Vickers, et al. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Brit J Audiol, 2000, 34: 205-224.

Google Scholar

[6] B.C.J. Moore, H. Gockel. Resolvability of components in complex tones and implications for theories of pitch perception. Hear Res, 2011, 276: 88-97.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.003

Google Scholar

[7] R.D. Patterson. The sound of a sinusoid: Time-interval models. J Acoust Soc Am, 1994, 96: 1419-1428.

Google Scholar

[8] R.D. Patterson, M.H. Allerhand, C. Giguère. Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: A modular architecture and a software platform. J Acoust Soc Am, 1995, 98: 1890-1894.

DOI: 10.1121/1.414456

Google Scholar

[9] D.H. Johnson. The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 1980, 68: 1115-1122.

DOI: 10.1121/1.384982

Google Scholar

[10] D.T. Ives, R.D. Patterson. Pitch strength decreases as F0 and harmonic resolution increase in complex tones composed exclusively of high harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am, 2008, 123: 2670-2679.

DOI: 10.1121/1.2890737

Google Scholar