A Decision Model to Estimate Contingency Budget for Complex Equipment Development Projects

Article Preview

Abstract:

Development of equipment is a complex process, which exposures to a great number of risks. Hence, many researchers suggest that organizations need to improve their ability to identify and to manage associated risks. To improve the risk management in complex equipment development projects, a pragmatic procedure is suggested to determine the size of a project's contingency plan budget at any specified level of certainty. Considering the interaction among risk factors, a method based on common risk factors and copula functions is used to model and quantify positive dependence between risks.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 860-863)

Pages:

3078-3081

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. H. Kwak and K. S. LaPlace, Examining risk tolerance in project-driven organization, Technovation, Vol. 25(2005) , p.691–695.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.003

Google Scholar

[2] M. A. Hogg and D. J. Terry, Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25(2000), p.121–140.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.2000.2791606

Google Scholar

[3] R. L. Dillon, M. E. Pate-Cornell, and S. D. Guikema, Optimal Use of Budget Reserves to Minimize Technical and Management Failure Risks During Complex Project Development, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 52(2005), p.382–395.

DOI: 10.1109/tem.2005.850733

Google Scholar

[4] J. E. Ramirez-Marquez and B. J. Sauser, System Development Planning via System Maturity Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 56(2009), p.533–548.

DOI: 10.1109/tem.2009.2013830

Google Scholar

[5] H. Khamooshi and D. F. Cioffi, Program Risk Contingency Budget Planning, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 56(2009), p.171–179.

DOI: 10.1109/tem.2008.927818

Google Scholar

[6] U. Ojiako, M. Ashleigh, M. Chipulu, and S. Maguire, Learning and teaching challenges in project management, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 29(2011), p.268–278.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.03.008

Google Scholar

[7] A. Touran, Calculation of contingency in construction projects, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 50(2003), p.135–140.

DOI: 10.1109/tem.2003.810824

Google Scholar

[8] M. Ranasinghe, Contingency allocation and management for building projects, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 12(1994), p.233–243.

DOI: 10.1080/01446199400000031

Google Scholar

[9] K. T. Yeo, Risks, Classification of Estimates, and Contingency Management, Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 6(1990), p.458–470.

Google Scholar

[10] D. F. Cioffi and H. Khamooshi, A practical method of determining project risk contingency budgets, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 60(2009), p.565–571.

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602586

Google Scholar

[11] J. R. van Dorp and M. R. Duffey, Statistical dependence in risk analysis for project networks using Monte Carlo methods, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 58(1999), p.17–29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00081-4

Google Scholar

[12] V. Musolino, A. Pievatolo, and E. Tironi, A statistical approach to electrical storage sizing with application to the recovery of braking energy, Energy, Vol. 36(2011), p.6697–6704.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.037

Google Scholar

[13] C. N. Haas, On modeling correlated random variables in risk assessment, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, Vol. 19(1999), p.1205–14.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01139.x

Google Scholar

[14] F. Durante and C. Sempi, Copula Theory : an Introduction, Copula Theory and Its Applications, Vol. 198(2010), p.3–31.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12465-5_1

Google Scholar