Indoor Environmental Quality Survey: A Brief Comparison between Different Post Occupancy Evaluation Methods

Alessandra Galatioto; Giuliana Leone; Daniele Milone; Salvatore Pitruzzella; Vincenzo Franzitta

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.1148

Paper Titles

The Stability Evaluations of Municipal Landfill in Malaysia for Future Land Use
p.1128

Energy Production from Natural Gas: Evaluation of Pontential Environmental Impacts Using Life Cycle Assesment Approach
p.1132

Analysis of the Influence of Water on the Ecological Consciousness of Rural Residents of Rural Water Environment
p.1139

Research on Creep Model of Loess Considering Construction of Underground Warehouse in China
p.1144

Indoor Environmental Quality Survey: A Brief Comparison between Different Post Occupancy Evaluation Methods
p.1148

Advice on Rural Ecological Planning and Environment Protection of Bengbu City
p.1153

Multi-Objective Optimum Design for Wave-Plate Demister Based on NSGA-ΙΙ Algorithm
p.1163

Electrokinetic Remediation of Railroad Soil Contaminated by Multi-Metals Using 2-D Reactor
p.1168

Deposition Properties of Sodium Carbonate in Supercritical Water in a Continuous-Flow Tubular Reactor
p.1172

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 864-867Indoor Environmental Quality Survey: A Brief...

Indoor Environmental Quality Survey: A Brief Comparison between Different Post Occupancy Evaluation Methods

Abstract:

Building occupants are important factor in giving information on indoor conditions such as comfort, productivity, building performance and occupants ́ health. Even that, being their appraisal mainly based on subjective judgments, it is difficult to set up a standard and objective method for this purpose. The present work aimed to describe, analyze and compare the most common tests on this topic, in order to highlight critical, failings and strengths.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

1148-1152

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.864-867.1148

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2013

Authors:

Alessandra Galatioto*, Giuliana Leone, Daniele Milone, Salvatore Pitruzzella, Vincenzo Franzitta

Keywords:

Indoor Environment Evaluation, Occupants Survey, Questionnaire

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] W. Preiser. The evolution of post occupancy evaluation. In: Federal Facilities Council, editor. Learning from our buildings. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Trapanese, V. Franzitta, A. Viola, D. Milone, A. Milone. A Case Study to the Evaluation of Global Environmental Quality, Concerning Thermal, Acoustic and Atmospheric Conditions of Urban Areas. Advanced Materials Research 726, 1068-1072.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.726-731.1068

Google Scholar

[3] M. Trapanese, V. Franzitta, G. Ciulla, V. Lo Brano, A. Viola. An Approach to Rank Noise Pollution in Workplaces. Advanced Materials Research 726, 3132-3136.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.726-731.3132

Google Scholar

[4] V. Franzitta, D. Milone, A. Viola, M. Trapanese. A procedure to evaluate the indoor global quality by a sub objective-objective procedure. Advanced Materials Research 734, 3065-3070.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.734-737.3065

Google Scholar

[5] POE. Post occupancy evaluation of daylight in buildings. IEA International Energy Agency. A Report of IEA SHC TASK 21 / ECBCS ANNEX 29. byStaffanHygge and Hans Allan Löfberg KTH-Royal Institute of Technology Centre for Built Environment Gävle, Sweden December (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Choia, V. Loftnessb, A. Azizb. Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines. Energy and Buildings 46 (2012) 167–175.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.08.009

Google Scholar

[7] N.D. Dahlan, P.J. Jones, D.K. Alexander, E. Saleth, J. Alias. Evidence base prioritization of indoor comfort perceptions in Malaysian typical multi-storey hostels. Building and Environment 44 (2009) 2158–2165.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.03.010

Google Scholar