Treatment of Wastewater with Different Ratios of Carbon to Nitrogen Using an Enhanced Nitrogen Removal System of Constructed Wetland

Article Preview

Abstract:

An enhanced nitrogen removal system of constructed wetland has been established, and for which kind of nitrogen containing wastewater was suitable to be treated by such enhanced system was also investigated. The results show that when co-controlled by intermittent aeration and carbon source addition, dissolved oxygen concentration and process carbon-nitrogen ratio in enhanced system were improved, meanwhile TN removal capability was enhanced. For wastewater that contains low concentration of carbon and nitrogen, or low concentration of carbon but high concentration of nitrogen, or high concentration of carbon and nitrogen, or high concentration of carbon and low concentration of nitrogen, the average removal efficiency of COD, TN, NH4+-N, NO3--N and TP in enhanced system were 68.1%, 78.2%, 70.8%, 86.7% and 71.2%, of which the purification capability was significantly better than that of the control system. The enhanced system is especially suitable for treatment of wastewater that contains low concentration of carbon and high nitrogen.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

1287-1292

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Nivala, M.B. Hoos, C. Cross. Science of Total Environment Vol. 380 (2007), pp.19-27.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Scholz, Å. Hedmark. Water Air Soil Pollution Vol. 205 (2010), pp.323-332.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Zhang, D. Xu, F. He. Ecological Engineering Vol. 47 (2012), pp.189-197.

Google Scholar

[4] R.H. Kadlec, S.D. Wallace: Treatment wetlands (2nd ed. ) (CRC Press, New York 2008).

Google Scholar

[5] S.C. Reed, D. Brown. Water Environmental Research Vol. 67 (1995), pp.244-248.

Google Scholar

[6] C.C. Tanner, R.H. Kadlec. Water Science Technology Vol. 48 (2003), pp.191-198.

Google Scholar

[7] J.Y. Zhang, S.L. Xia, K. Xiong. Environmental Science Vol. 19 (1998), pp.36-39. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] M.Y. Wu, E.H. Franz, S. Chen. Water Environmental Research Vol. 73 (2001), pp.661-666.

Google Scholar

[9] J.L. Richardson, M.J. Vepraskas: Wetland soils: genesis, hydrology, landscapes and classification (CRC Press, Florida 2001).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Green, E. Friedler, I. Safrai. Water Research Vol. 32(1998), pp.3513-3520.

Google Scholar

[11] C. Ouellet-Plamondon, F. Chazarenc, Y. Comeau. Ecological Engineering Vol. 27 (2006), pp.258-264.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.03.006

Google Scholar

[12] M. Tao, F. He, D. Xu. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies Vol. 19, (2010), pp.181-189.

Google Scholar

[13] D.C. Garcia-Montiel, J.M. Melillo. Biology Fertile Soils Vol. 38 (2003), pp.267-72.

Google Scholar

[14] L.H. She, F. He, D. Xu. Environmental Science Vol. 30 (2009), pp.3300-330. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] China State Environmental Protection Administration: Monitoring and Determination Methods for Water and Wastewater (4th ed. ) (China Environmental Science Press, Beijing 2002).

Google Scholar

[16] T.S. Jamieson, G.W. Stratton, R. Gordon. Canadian Biosystems Engineering Vol. 45 (2003), pp.109-114.

Google Scholar

[17] R.H. Kadlec, H. Robert. Water Science Technology Vol. 40 (1999), pp.37-44.

Google Scholar

[18] X.Y. Lian, X.L. Li, X.F. Xie. Electric Power Environmental Protection Vol. 2 (2008), pp.27-29. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[19] L.F. Zhao, W. Zhu, J. Zhao. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae Vol. 26 (2006), pp.1821-1827. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar