Research on Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) in Cement Kiln

Article Preview

Abstract:

The efficiency and problem of SNCR in cement are explained by case study .Catalyst also is discussed by the research. And this paper presents and discusses the technical feasibility issues related to implementing SCR technology at cement plant. Some pilot plant trial and scale-full plant are also discussed and the result show that SCR can reduce NOx emissions from cement kilns by greater than 90% and achieve less than 100 mg/Nm3 NOx emissions. The fact suggests that it is a more effective and proven technology to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from cement kilns.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 864-867)

Pages:

1441-1444

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Reduction of nitrogen oxides with SNCR technology at Slite cement plant. Per Junker, Director of Environment Protection. Session 16 Cement Industry.

Google Scholar

[2] Scur, P., and H. Hoppe. The present state of NOx abatement with the SNCR process. Cement International. February (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] Gurudas SAMANT, in: New developments of High Dust-SCR technology in the cement industry Results of pilot tests in Solnhoffen and development state of a full scale SCR unit. Agence Fédérale de l'Environnement.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Carter, B. Neuffer. in: PCA Comments on the Alternative Control Techniques Document Update – NOx Emissions from New Cement Kilns. Draft dated June 2007. August 20, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] Portland Cement Association. Report on NOx Formation and Variability in Portland Cement Kiln Systems Potential Control Techniques and Their Feasibility and Cost Effectiveness. PCA R&D Serial No. 2227. Prepared by Penta Engineering Corp. (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] Su U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Alternative Control Techniques Document – NOx Emissions from Cement Manufacturing. EPA-453/R-94-004. March (1994).

Google Scholar

[7] ELEX. Website: http: /www. elex. ch/doc/denox. pdf. Accessed March 6, (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] Kossina, I. Reduction of NOx Emissions from Exhaust Gases of Cement Kilns by SelectiveCatalytic Reduction. Dipl. -Ing. Proceedings of NOx Conference, Paris. March (2001).

Google Scholar

[9] Portland Cement Association. Report on NOx Formation and Variability in Portland Cement Kiln Systems Potential Control Techniques and Their Feasibility and Cost Effectiveness. PCA R&D Serial No. 2227. Prepared by Penta Engineering Corp. (1999).

Google Scholar

[10] Linero, A. SNCR NOx at US Cement Plants. Is SCR Close Behind? Paper #638 presented at the AWMA Annual Conference. June (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Alternative Control Techniques Document – NOx Emissions from Cement Manufacturing. EPA-453/R-94-004. March 1994. Available at www. epa. gov/ttn/cata/dir1/cement. pdf.

Google Scholar

[12] ELEX. Website: http: /www. elex. ch/doc/denox. pdf.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Linero, Florida Department of Environmental Protection. SCR – Cement Kilns. March 28, (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] A. Linero, Comments on Draft Alternative Control Techniques Document Update – NOx Emissions from New Cement Kilns (June 2006). July 18, (2007).

Google Scholar

[15] Hudson. Summary of Research Concerning Applicability of Selective Catalytic Reduction to Control Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides from the Proposed St. Lawrence Cement Company Cement Manufacturing Facility in Hudson/ Greenport, New York. Undated.

Google Scholar

[16] EPRI. State of Knowledge Concerning Fuel Impacts on SCR Performance and Longevity. Palo Alto, CA. 2002. pp. A-1–A-5.

Google Scholar

[17] Prichard, S.G., et al. Undated. SCR Catalyst Performance Under Severe Operation Conditions. CORMETECH, Inc. p.5.

Google Scholar

[18] Pritchard, S.G., et al. 1995. Optimizing SCR Catalyst Design and Performance for Coal-Fired Boilers. CORMETECH, Inc., Durham, N.C. May 1995. p.17.

Google Scholar